These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

364 related items for PubMed ID: 12699189

  • 1. Interface perturbation effects in high-energy electron beams.
    Verhaegen F.
    Phys Med Biol; 2003 Mar 21; 48(6):687-705. PubMed ID: 12699189
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. Monte Carlo simulation of backscatter from lead for clinical electron beams using EGSnrc.
    Chow JC, Grigorov GN.
    Med Phys; 2008 Apr 21; 35(4):1241-50. PubMed ID: 18491516
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. Secondary electron fluence perturbation by high-Z interfaces in clinical proton beams: a Monte Carlo study.
    Verhaegen F, Palmans H.
    Phys Med Biol; 1999 Jan 21; 44(1):167-83. PubMed ID: 10071882
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. Solid water as phantom material for dosimetry of electron backscatter using low-energy electron beams: a Monte Carlo evaluation.
    Chow JC, Owrangi AM.
    Med Phys; 2009 May 21; 36(5):1587-94. PubMed ID: 19544774
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. Monte Carlo dose calculations in homogeneous media and at interfaces: a comparison between GEPTS, EGSnrc, MCNP, and measurements.
    Chibani O, Li XA.
    Med Phys; 2002 May 21; 29(5):835-47. PubMed ID: 12033580
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. Perturbation correction factors for the NACP-02 plane-parallel ionization chamber in water in high-energy electron beams.
    Verhaegen F, Zakikhani R, Dusautoy A, Palmans H, Bostock G, Shipley D, Seuntjens J.
    Phys Med Biol; 2006 Mar 07; 51(5):1221-35. PubMed ID: 16481689
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. Fluence correction factors in plastic phantoms for clinical proton beams.
    Palmans H, Symons JE, Denis JM, de Kock EA, Jones DT, Vynckier S.
    Phys Med Biol; 2002 Sep 07; 47(17):3055-71. PubMed ID: 12361210
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. Are neutrons responsible for the dose discrepancies between Monte Carlo calculations and measurements in the build-up region for a high-energy photon beam?
    Ding GX, Duzenli C, Kalach NI.
    Phys Med Biol; 2002 Sep 07; 47(17):3251-61. PubMed ID: 12361221
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. Extracting Wair from the electron beam measurements of Domen and Lamperti.
    Tessier F, Cojocaru CD, Ross CK.
    Med Phys; 2018 Jan 07; 45(1):370-381. PubMed ID: 29131343
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. Out-of-field doses and neutron dose equivalents for electron beams from modern Varian and Elekta linear accelerators.
    Cardenas CE, Nitsch PL, Kudchadker RJ, Howell RM, Kry SF.
    J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2016 Jul 08; 17(4):442-455. PubMed ID: 27455499
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. Evaluation of backscatter dose from internal lead shielding in clinical electron beams using EGSnrc Monte Carlo simulations.
    De Vries RJ, Marsh S.
    J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2015 Nov 08; 16(6):139–150. PubMed ID: 26699566
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. Dosimetry using plane-parallel ionization chambers in a 75 MeV clinical proton beam.
    Palmans H, Verhaegen F, Denis JM, Vynckier S.
    Phys Med Biol; 2002 Aug 21; 47(16):2895-905. PubMed ID: 12222853
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 19.