These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search


121 related items for PubMed ID: 12700796

  • 1.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. Genetic selection for deafness: the views of hearing children of deaf adults.
    Mand C, Duncan RE, Gillam L, Collins V, Delatycki MB.
    J Med Ethics; 2009 Dec; 35(12):722-8. PubMed ID: 19948926
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. Reproductive autonomy rights and genetic disenhancement: sidestepping the argument from backhanded benefit.
    Harvey M.
    J Appl Philos; 2004 Dec; 21(2):125-40. PubMed ID: 15462027
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. The choice to have a disabled child.
    Michie S, Marteau TM.
    Am J Hum Genet; 1999 Oct; 65(4):1204-8. PubMed ID: 10486532
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. Reproductive autonomous choice--a cherished illusion? Reproductive autonomy examined in the context of preimplantation genetic diagnosis.
    Zeiler K.
    Med Health Care Philos; 2004 Oct; 7(2):175-83. PubMed ID: 15379192
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. A sense of autonomy is preserved under Chinese reproductive policies.
    Su B, Macer DR.
    New Genet Soc; 2005 Apr; 24(1):15-29. PubMed ID: 16552915
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. Prenatal screening: current practice, new developments, ethical challenges.
    de Jong A, Maya I, van Lith JM.
    Bioethics; 2015 Jan; 29(1):1-8. PubMed ID: 25521968
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. Prenatal screening, autonomy and reasons: the relationship between the law of abortion and wrongful birth.
    Scott R.
    Med Law Rev; 2003 Jan; 11(3):265-325. PubMed ID: 16733877
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. Deafness, genetics and dysgenics.
    Nunes R.
    Med Health Care Philos; 2006 Jan; 9(1):25-31. PubMed ID: 16645795
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. Live and let die? Disability in bioethics.
    Vehmas S.
    New Rev Bioeth; 2003 Nov; 1(1):145-57. PubMed ID: 15706681
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. Attitudes of the broader hearing, deaf, and hard-of-hearing community toward genetic testing for deafness.
    Martinez A, Linden J, Schimmenti LA, Palmer CG.
    Genet Med; 2003 Nov; 5(2):106-12. PubMed ID: 12644780
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. Is it ever morally permissible to select for deafness in one's child?
    Wallis JM.
    Med Health Care Philos; 2020 Mar; 23(1):3-15. PubMed ID: 31542873
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. Reproductive guidance through prenatal diagnosis and genetic counseling for recessive hereditary hearing loss in high-risk families.
    Deng Y, Sang S, Wen J, Liu Y, Ling J, Chen H, Cai X, Mei L, Chen X, Li M, Li W, Li T, He C, Feng Y.
    Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol; 2018 Dec; 115():114-119. PubMed ID: 30368370
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. Choosing deafness with preimplantation genetic diagnosis: an ethical way to carry on a cultural bloodline?
    Camporesi S.
    Camb Q Healthc Ethics; 2010 Dec; 19(1):86-96. PubMed ID: 20025805
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]


    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 7.