These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

465 related items for PubMed ID: 12705307

  • 1.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. Dynamic fatigue properties of the dental implant-abutment interface: joint opening in wide-diameter versus standard-diameter hex-type implants.
    Hoyer SA, Stanford CM, Buranadham S, Fridrich T, Wagner J, Gratton D.
    J Prosthet Dent; 2001 Jun; 85(6):599-607. PubMed ID: 11404760
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. Wave analysis of implant screw loosening using an air cylindrical cyclic loading device.
    Lee J, Kim YS, Kim CW, Han JS.
    J Prosthet Dent; 2002 Oct; 88(4):402-8. PubMed ID: 12447217
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. In vitro evaluation of reverse torque value of abutment screw and marginal opening in a screw- and cement-retained implant fixed partial denture design.
    Kim SG, Park JU, Jeong JH, Bae C, Bae TS, Chee W.
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2009 Oct; 24(6):1061-7. PubMed ID: 20162110
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. Implant abutment screw rotations and preloads for four different screw materials and surfaces.
    Martin WC, Woody RD, Miller BH, Miller AW.
    J Prosthet Dent; 2001 Jul; 86(1):24-32. PubMed ID: 11458261
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. Effect of implant connection and restoration design (screwed vs. cemented) in reliability and failure modes of anterior crowns.
    Freitas AC, Bonfante EA, Rocha EP, Silva NR, Marotta L, Coelho PG.
    Eur J Oral Sci; 2011 Aug; 119(4):323-30. PubMed ID: 21726295
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. Clinical evaluation of the incidence of prosthetic complications in implant crowns constructed with UCLA castable abutments. A cohort follow-up study.
    Montero J, Manzano G, Beltrán D, Lynch CD, Suárez-García MJ, Castillo-Oyagüe R.
    J Dent; 2012 Dec; 40(12):1081-9. PubMed ID: 22982530
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. A screwless and cementless technique for the restoration of single-tooth implants: a retrospective cohort study.
    Urdaneta RA, Marincola M, Weed M, Chuang SK.
    J Prosthodont; 2008 Oct; 17(7):562-71. PubMed ID: 18761575
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. Elongation and preload stress in dental implant abutment screws.
    Haack JE, Sakaguchi RL, Sun T, Coffey JP.
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 1995 Oct; 10(5):529-36. PubMed ID: 7590997
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. A technique for locating implant abutment screws of posterior cement-retained metal-ceramic restorations with ceramic occlusal surfaces.
    Schwedhelm ER, Raigrodski AJ.
    J Prosthet Dent; 2006 Feb; 95(2):165-7. PubMed ID: 16473092
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. Experimental zirconia abutments for implant-supported single-tooth restorations in esthetically demanding regions: 4-year results of a prospective clinical study.
    Glauser R, Sailer I, Wohlwend A, Studer S, Schibli M, Schärer P.
    Int J Prosthodont; 2004 Feb; 17(3):285-90. PubMed ID: 15237873
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. Evaluation of the effect of retightening and mechanical cycling on preload maintenance of retention screws.
    Delben JA, Gomes EA, Barão VA, Assunção WG.
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2011 Feb; 26(2):251-6. PubMed ID: 21483877
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. Evaluation of gold-machined UCLA-type abutments and CAD/CAM titanium abutments with hexagonal external connection and with internal connection.
    Vigolo P, Fonzi F, Majzoub Z, Cordioli G.
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2008 Feb; 23(2):247-52. PubMed ID: 18548920
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. Evaluation of a new method to achieve optimal passivity of implant-supported superstructures.
    Goossens IC, Herbst D.
    SADJ; 2003 Aug; 58(7):279-85, 287. PubMed ID: 14649041
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. The comparison of provisional luting agents and abutment surface roughness on the retention of provisional implant-supported crowns.
    Kim Y, Yamashita J, Shotwell JL, Chong KH, Wang HL.
    J Prosthet Dent; 2006 Jun; 95(6):450-5. PubMed ID: 16765158
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. Dynamic fatigue resistance of implant-abutment junction in an internally notched morse-taper oral implant: influence of abutment design.
    Cehreli MC, Akça K, Iplikçioğlu H, Sahin S.
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2004 Aug; 15(4):459-65. PubMed ID: 15248881
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 24.