These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

121 related items for PubMed ID: 1270917

  • 1. Cochlear implants.
    Michelson RP.
    J Laryngol Otol; 1976 May; 90(5):441-4. PubMed ID: 1270917
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. Present status and future development of the cochlear prosthesis.
    Michelson RP, Merzenich MM, Schindler RA, Schindler DN.
    Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol; 1975 May; 84(4 Pt 1):494-8. PubMed ID: 1155884
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. Auditory prostheses research with multiple channel intracochlear stimulation in man.
    Eddington DK, Dobelle WH, Brackmann DE, Mladejovsky MG, Parkin JL.
    Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol; 1978 May; 87(6 Pt 2):1-39. PubMed ID: 736424
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. Pure-Tone Masking Patterns for Monopolar and Phantom Electrical Stimulation in Cochlear Implants.
    Saoji AA, Koka K, Litvak LM, Finley CC.
    Ear Hear; 2018 May; 39(1):124-130. PubMed ID: 28700446
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. The cochlear implant; basic principles.
    Brackmann DE.
    Laryngoscope; 1976 Mar; 86(3):373-88. PubMed ID: 1256212
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. Electrical cochlear stimulation in the deaf cat: comparisons between psychophysical and central auditory neuronal thresholds.
    Beitel RE, Snyder RL, Schreiner CE, Raggio MW, Leake PA.
    J Neurophysiol; 2000 Apr; 83(4):2145-62. PubMed ID: 10758124
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. Artifical hearing for the deaf by cochlear stimulation: pitch modulation and some parametric thresholds.
    Mladejovsky MG, Eddington DK, Dobelle WH, Brackmann DE.
    Trans Am Soc Artif Intern Organs; 1975 Apr; 21():1-7. PubMed ID: 1145982
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. [Physiological basis for a cochlear prosthesis (author's transl)].
    Klinke R, Hartmann R.
    Arch Otorhinolaryngol; 1979 Apr; 223(1):77-137. PubMed ID: 383060
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. Physiological and clinical aspects of the rehabilitation of total deafness by implantation of multiple intracochlear electrodes.
    Pialoux P, Chouard CH, MacLeod P.
    Acta Otolaryngol; 1976 Apr; 81(5-6):436-41. PubMed ID: 1274555
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. Bilateral effects of unilateral cochlear implantation in congenitally deaf cats.
    O'Neil JN, Limb CJ, Baker CA, Ryugo DK.
    J Comp Neurol; 2010 Jun 15; 518(12):2382-404. PubMed ID: 20437534
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. Neural tonotopy in cochlear implants: an evaluation in unilateral cochlear implant patients with unilateral deafness and tinnitus.
    Vermeire K, Nobbe A, Schleich P, Nopp P, Voormolen MH, Van de Heyning PH.
    Hear Res; 2008 Nov 15; 245(1-2):98-106. PubMed ID: 18817861
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. A Cochlear Implant Performance Prognostic Test Based on Electrical Field Interactions Evaluated by eABR (Electrical Auditory Brainstem Responses).
    Guevara N, Hoen M, Truy E, Gallego S.
    PLoS One; 2016 Nov 15; 11(5):e0155008. PubMed ID: 27149268
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. Place dependent stimulation rates improve pitch perception in cochlear implantees with single-sided deafness.
    Rader T, Döge J, Adel Y, Weissgerber T, Baumann U.
    Hear Res; 2016 Sep 15; 339():94-103. PubMed ID: 27374479
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. Investigations towards an artificial cochlea.
    Hochmair ES, Hochmair-Desoyer IJ, Burian K.
    Int J Artif Organs; 1979 Sep 15; 2(5):255-61. PubMed ID: 582589
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. Auditory brainstem activity and development evoked by apical versus basal cochlear implant electrode stimulation in children.
    Gordon KA, Papsin BC, Harrison RV.
    Clin Neurophysiol; 2007 Aug 15; 118(8):1671-84. PubMed ID: 17588811
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. Advances in auditory prostheses.
    Shannon RV.
    Curr Opin Neurol; 2012 Feb 15; 25(1):61-6. PubMed ID: 22157109
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. Fundamental considerations in designing auditory implants.
    Kiang NY, Eddington DK, Delgutte B.
    Acta Otolaryngol; 1979 Feb 15; 87(3-4):204-18. PubMed ID: 443001
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. Some considerations of multichannel electrical stimulation of the auditory nerve in the profoundly deaf; interfacing electrode arrays with the auditory nerve array.
    Merzenich MM, White M, Vivion MC, Leake-Jones PA, Walsh S.
    Acta Otolaryngol; 1979 Feb 15; 87(3-4):196-203. PubMed ID: 443000
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. AUDITORY NERVE: ELECTRICAL STIMULATION IN MAN.
    SIMMONS FB, EPLEY JM, LUMMIS RC, GUTTMAN N, FRISHKOPF LS, HARMON LD, ZWICKER E.
    Science; 1965 Apr 02; 148(3666):104-6. PubMed ID: 14258725
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. Restoration of auditory nerve synapses in cats by cochlear implants.
    Ryugo DK, Kretzmer EA, Niparko JK.
    Science; 2005 Dec 02; 310(5753):1490-2. PubMed ID: 16322457
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 7.