These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

274 related items for PubMed ID: 12714404

  • 1. Agreement between frequency doubling perimetry and static perimetry in eyes with high tension glaucoma and normal tension glaucoma.
    Kogure S, Toda Y, Crabb D, Kashiwagi K, Fitzke FW, Tsukahara S.
    Br J Ophthalmol; 2003 May; 87(5):604-8. PubMed ID: 12714404
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. Frequency doubling technology perimetry in open-angle glaucoma eyes with hemifield visual field damage: comparison of high-tension and normal-tension groups.
    Murata H, Tomidokoro A, Matsuo H, Tomita G, Araie M.
    J Glaucoma; 2007 Jan; 16(1):9-13. PubMed ID: 17224743
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. Morphological and functional differences between normal-tension and high-tension glaucoma.
    Häntzschel J, Terai N, Sorgenfrei F, Haustein M, Pillunat K, Pillunat LE.
    Acta Ophthalmol; 2013 Aug; 91(5):e386-91. PubMed ID: 23387808
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. [Comparison of detectability of visual field abnormality by frequency doubling technology in primary open-angle glaucoma and normal-tension glaucoma].
    Horikoshi N, Osako M, Tamura Y, Okano T, Usui M.
    Nippon Ganka Gakkai Zasshi; 2001 Apr; 105(4):244-50. PubMed ID: 11329948
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. Detection of glaucomatous visual field defect by nonconventional perimetry.
    Iester M, Altieri M, Vittone P, Calabria G, Zingirian M, Traverso CE.
    Am J Ophthalmol; 2003 Jan; 135(1):35-9. PubMed ID: 12504694
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. Comparison of the Automated Pattern-Noise (PANO) Glaucoma Test with the HFA, an FDT Stimulus, and the Fundus Area Cup-to-disk Ratio.
    Hannen T, El-Khoury S, Patel R, Ngounou F, Preußner PR.
    J Curr Glaucoma Pract; 2021 Jan; 15(3):132-138. PubMed ID: 35173395
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. Frequency-doubling technology perimetry for detection of the development of visual field defects in glaucoma suspect eyes: a prospective study.
    Liu S, Yu M, Weinreb RN, Lai G, Lam DS, Leung CK.
    JAMA Ophthalmol; 2014 Jan; 132(1):77-83. PubMed ID: 24177945
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 14.