These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

193 related items for PubMed ID: 12715818

  • 21.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 22.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 23.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 24. The Davis dilemma: how to prevent battles over frozen preembryos.
    Panitch AR.
    Case West Reserve Law Rev; 1991; 41(2):543-79. PubMed ID: 16127877
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 25.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 26. Family law conundrums in assisted reproduction.
    Waldman EA.
    Whittier Law Rev; 1999; 21(2):451-60. PubMed ID: 12199239
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 27. Sperm, egg, and a petri dish. Unveiling the underlying property issues surrounding cryopreserved embryos.
    Langley LS, Blackston JW.
    J Leg Med; 2006 Jun; 27(2):167-206. PubMed ID: 16728352
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 28. Disputes over frozen preembryos and the "right not to be a parent".
    Pachman TS.
    Columbia J Gend Law; 2003 Jun; 12(1):128-53. PubMed ID: 16281330
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 29.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 30. Reconciling property law with advances in reproductive science.
    Brown B.
    Stanford Law Pol Rev; 1995 Jun; 6(2):73-88. PubMed ID: 11655141
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 31.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 32.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 33. Assisted reproductive technologies: contracts, consents, and controversies.
    Elster NR.
    Am J Fam Law; 2005 Jun; 18(4):193-9. PubMed ID: 17153245
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 34.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 35.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 36. My egg, your sperm, whose preembryo? A proposal for deciding which party receives custody of frozen preembryos.
    Katz DA.
    Va J Soc Policy Law; 1998 Jun; 5(3):623-74. PubMed ID: 11979606
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 37. In-vitro fertilization, frozen embryos, and the right to privacy--are mandatory donation laws constitutional?
    Schaefer K.
    Pac Law J; 1990 Oct; 22(1):87-121. PubMed ID: 16047419
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 38.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 39.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 40. Kass v. Kass.
    New York. Court of Appeals..
    North East Rep Second Ser; 1998 May 07; 696():174-82. PubMed ID: 11852946
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Previous] [Next] [New Search]
    of 10.