These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

198 related items for PubMed ID: 12723172

  • 1. [Blue-yellow full threshold automated perimetry in glaucoma diagnosis].
    Bobeico V, Zemba M, Brătulescu M, Ciucă C, Popescu M.
    Oftalmologia; 2002; 55(4):18-24. PubMed ID: 12723172
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. Diagnostic sensitivity of fast blue-yellow and standard automated perimetry in early glaucoma: a comparison between different test programs.
    Bengtsson B, Heijl A.
    Ophthalmology; 2006 Jul; 113(7):1092-7. PubMed ID: 16815399
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. Comparing threshold visual fields between the Dicon TKS 4000 automated perimeter and the Humphrey Field Analyzer.
    Wong AY, Dodge RM, Remington LA.
    J Am Optom Assoc; 1995 Nov; 66(11):706-11. PubMed ID: 8576536
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. Multifocal blue-on-yellow visual evoked potentials in early glaucoma.
    Klistorner A, Graham SL, Martins A, Grigg JR, Arvind H, Kumar RS, James AC, Billson FA.
    Ophthalmology; 2007 Sep; 114(9):1613-21. PubMed ID: 17822971
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. Selective perimetry in glaucoma diagnosis.
    Sakata LM, DeLeón-Ortega J, Girkin CA.
    Curr Opin Ophthalmol; 2007 Mar; 18(2):115-21. PubMed ID: 17301612
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. The ability of Medmont M600 automated perimetry to detect threats to fixation.
    Zhang L, Drance SM, Douglas GR.
    J Glaucoma; 1997 Aug; 6(4):259-62. PubMed ID: 9264306
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. [Computer perimetry--rapid TOP (tendency oriented perimetry) and normal threshold methods in clinical practice--comparison of results].
    Kratochvilová P.
    Cesk Slov Oftalmol; 2002 May; 58(3):187-93. PubMed ID: 12087665
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. An evaluation of algorithms designed to classify the results from frequency doubling perimetry.
    Müskens RP, Heeg GP, Jansonius NM.
    Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 2004 Nov; 24(6):498-503. PubMed ID: 15491477
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. Diagnosis and long term follow up of glaucomatous visual field defects with automated perimetry.
    LeBlanc RP.
    Bull Soc Belge Ophtalmol; 1992 Nov; 244():105-27. PubMed ID: 1297506
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. Comparison of threshold visual perimetry and objective pupil perimetry in clinical patients.
    Yoshitomi T, Matsui T, Tanakadate A, Ishikawa S.
    J Neuroophthalmol; 1999 Jun; 19(2):89-99. PubMed ID: 10380129
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 10.