These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search


232 related items for PubMed ID: 12725373

  • 1. Influence of stainless steel inserts on the resistance to sliding of esthetic brackets with second-order angulation in the dry and wet states.
    Thorstenson G, Kusy R.
    Angle Orthod; 2003 Apr; 73(2):167-75. PubMed ID: 12725373
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. Static frictional resistances of polycrystalline ceramic brackets with metal slot inserts.
    Rajakulendran J, Jones S.
    Aust Orthod J; 2006 Nov; 22(2):147-52. PubMed ID: 17203579
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. Evaluation of esthetic brackets' resistance to torsional forces from the archwire.
    Nishio C, Mendes Ade M, Almeida MA, Tanaka E, Tanne K, Elias CN.
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2009 Jan; 135(1):42-8. PubMed ID: 19121499
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. Resistance to sliding of orthodontic brackets with bumps in the slot floors and walls: effects of second-order angulation.
    Thorstenson GA, Kusy RP.
    Dent Mater; 2004 Nov; 20(9):881-92. PubMed ID: 15451244
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. Effects of ligation type and method on the resistance to sliding of novel orthodontic brackets with second-order angulation in the dry and wet states.
    Thorstenson GA, Kusy RP.
    Angle Orthod; 2003 Aug; 73(4):418-30. PubMed ID: 12940563
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. Comparison of the frictional coefficients for selected archwire-bracket slot combinations in the dry and wet states.
    Kusy RP, Whitley JQ, Prewitt MJ.
    Angle Orthod; 1991 Aug; 61(4):293-302. PubMed ID: 1763840
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. Static frictional force and surface roughness of various bracket and wire combinations.
    Doshi UH, Bhad-Patil WA.
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2011 Jan; 139(1):74-9. PubMed ID: 21195280
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. Influence of interbracket distances on the resistance to sliding of orthodontic appliances.
    Whitley JQ, Kusy RP.
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2007 Sep; 132(3):360-72. PubMed ID: 17826605
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. The friction and wear patterns of orthodontic brackets and archwires in the dry state.
    Michelberger DJ, Eadie RL, Faulkner MG, Glover KE, Prasad NG, Major PW.
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2000 Dec; 118(6):662-74. PubMed ID: 11113802
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. Influence of angulation on the resistance to sliding in fixed appliances.
    Articolo LC, Kusy RP.
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 1999 Jan; 115(1):39-51. PubMed ID: 9878956
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. Evaluation of titanium brackets for orthodontic treatment: Part II--The active configuration.
    Kusy RP, O'grady PW.
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2000 Dec; 118(6):675-84. PubMed ID: 11113803
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]


    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 12.