These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
5. Primary PTCA versus thrombolysis with tPA in acute myocardial infarction: a formal cost-effectiveness analysis. Müllner M, Paulis M, Nikfardjam M, Domanovits H, Huber K. Wien Klin Wochenschr; 1999 Jan 15; 111(1):37-41. PubMed ID: 10067269 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. [PTCA in acute myocardial infarct: primary, immediate, delayed or elective?]. Rutsch W. Herz; 1992 Feb 15; 17(1):50-63. PubMed ID: 1541450 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Primary angioplasty is cost-minimizing compared with pre-hospital thrombolysis for patients within 60 min of a percutaneous coronary intervention center: the Comparison of Angioplasty and Pre-hospital Thrombolysis in Acute Myocardial Infarction (CAPTIM) cost-efficacy sub-study. Machecourt J, Bonnefoy E, Vanzetto G, Motreff P, Marlière S, Leizorovicz A, Allenet B, Lacroute JM, Cassagnes J, Touboul P. J Am Coll Cardiol; 2005 Feb 15; 45(4):515-24. PubMed ID: 15708697 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. [Comments on the article "Comparison of the cost effectiveness of treatment of acute myocardial infarct with primary angioplasty and thrombolysis" by Golán et al]. Vlcek J. Vnitr Lek; 2003 Feb 15; 49(2):87-8. PubMed ID: 12728569 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. [Favorable long-term results of primary percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty in acute myocardial infarction compared to intravenous streptokinase treatment; a randomized study]. Liem AL, Zijlstra F. Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd; 1995 Dec 09; 139(49):2564-7. PubMed ID: 8657319 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Multicentre randomized trial comparing transport to primary angioplasty vs immediate thrombolysis vs combined strategy for patients with acute myocardial infarction presenting to a community hospital without a catheterization laboratory. The PRAGUE study. Widimský P, Groch L, Zelízko M, Aschermann M, Bednár F, Suryapranata H. Eur Heart J; 2000 May 09; 21(10):823-31. PubMed ID: 10781354 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Primary coronary angioplasty compared with intravenous thrombolytic therapy for acute myocardial infarction: six-month follow up and analysis of individual patient data from randomized trials. Grines C, Patel A, Zijlstra F, Weaver WD, Granger C, Simes RJ, PCAT Collaborators. Percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty. Am Heart J; 2003 Jan 09; 145(1):47-57. PubMed ID: 12514654 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. [Evaluation of the cost of a systematic early reperfusion of the infarction artery by primary or salvage angioplasty]. Himbert D, Simon-Lorière Y, Juliard JM, Steg PG, Aumont MC, Gourgon R. Ann Cardiol Angeiol (Paris); 1997 Nov 09; 46(9):569-76. PubMed ID: 9538368 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Cost effectiveness of enoxaparin in acute ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction: the ExTRACT-TIMI 25 (Enoxaparin and Thrombolysis Reperfusion for Acute Myocardial Infarction Treatment-Thrombolysis In Myocardial Infarction 25) study. Marcoff L, Zhang Z, Zhang W, Ewen E, Jurkovitz C, Leguet P, Kolm P, Weintraub WS. J Am Coll Cardiol; 2009 Sep 29; 54(14):1271-9. PubMed ID: 19778669 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Cost-effectiveness of intense insulin treatment after acute myocardial infarction in patients with diabetes mellitus; results from the DIGAMI study. Almbrand B, Johannesson M, Sjöstrand B, Malmberg K, Rydén L. Eur Heart J; 2000 May 29; 21(9):733-9. PubMed ID: 10739728 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of facilitated percutaneous coronary intervention compared with primary percutaneous coronary intervention in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction transferred from community hospitals. Coleman CI, McKay RG, Boden WE, Mather JF, White CM. Clin Ther; 2006 Jul 29; 28(7):1054-62. PubMed ID: 16990084 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. In-hospital and one-year outcomes of patients with high-risk acute myocardial infarction treated with thrombolysis or primary coronary angioplasty. Steffenino G, Santoro GM, Maras P, Mauri F, Ardissino D, Violini R, Chiarella F, Lucci D, Marini M, Baldasseroni S, Maggioni AP, Myocardial Infarction with Severe prognosis: observation of Treatment with Angioplasty or Lysis Study Investigators. Ital Heart J; 2004 Feb 29; 5(2):136-45. PubMed ID: 15086144 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. [Cost-effectiveness analysis of an invasive therapeutic approach to coronary disease]. Urban P. Schweiz Med Wochenschr; 1996 Sep 28; 126(39):1661-4. PubMed ID: 8927970 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Cost effectiveness of thrombolytic therapy with streptokinase in elderly patients with suspected acute myocardial infarction. Krumholz HM, Pasternak RC, Weinstein MC, Friesinger GC, Ridker PM, Tosteson AN, Goldman L. N Engl J Med; 1992 Jul 02; 327(1):7-13. PubMed ID: 1598117 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Cost-effectiveness of primary percutaneous coronary intervention versus thrombolytic therapy for acute myocardial infarction. Selmer R, Halvorsen S, Myhre KI, Wisløff TF, Kristiansen IS. Scand Cardiovasc J; 2005 Oct 02; 39(5):276-85. PubMed ID: 16269397 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Interhospital transport for primary angioplasty improves the long-term outcome of acute myocardial infarction compared with immediate thrombolysis in the nearest hospital (one-year follow-up of the PRAGUE-1 study). Bednár F, Widimský P, Krupicka J, Groch L, Aschermann M, Zelízko M, PRAGUE Study Group Investigators. Can J Cardiol; 2003 Sep 02; 19(10):1133-7. PubMed ID: 14532938 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] Page: [Next] [New Search]