These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

332 related items for PubMed ID: 12737254

  • 1. Comparisons of precision of fit between cast and CNC-milled titanium implant frameworks for the edentulous mandible.
    Ortorp A, Jemt T, Bäck T, Jälevik T.
    Int J Prosthodont; 2003; 16(2):194-200. PubMed ID: 12737254
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. A comparison of the accuracy of fit of 2 methods for fabricating implant-prosthodontic frameworks.
    Al-Fadda SA, Zarb GA, Finer Y.
    Int J Prosthodont; 2007; 20(2):125-31. PubMed ID: 17455431
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. On cobalt-chrome frameworks in implant dentistry.
    Hjalmarsson L.
    Swed Dent J Suppl; 2009; (201):3-83. PubMed ID: 20143574
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. Photogrammetry--an alternative to conventional impressions in implant dentistry? A clinical pilot study.
    Jemt T, Bäck T, Petersson A.
    Int J Prosthodont; 1999; 12(4):363-8. PubMed ID: 10635208
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. Implant-supported laser-welded titanium and conventional cast frameworks in the partially edentulous law: a 5-year prospective multicenter study.
    Jemt T, Henry P, Lindén B, Naert I, Weber H, Wendelhag I.
    Int J Prosthodont; 2003; 16(4):415-21. PubMed ID: 12956498
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. Vertical marginal gap evaluation of conventional cast and computer numeric controlled-milled titanium full-arch implant-supported frameworks.
    Alfadda SA.
    Int J Prosthodont; 2014; 27(6):517-22. PubMed ID: 25390864
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. A simplified method to assess precision of fit between framework and supporting implants: a preliminary study.
    Calderini A, Maiorana C, Garlini G, Abbondanza T.
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2007; 22(5):831-8. PubMed ID: 17974120
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. Clinical experience of CNC-milled titanium frameworks supported by implants in the edentulous jaw: a 3-year interim report.
    Ortorp A, Jemt T.
    Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2002; 4(2):104-9. PubMed ID: 12121610
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. In vitro vertical misfit evaluation of cast frameworks for cement-retained implant-supported partial prostheses.
    Oyagüe RC, Turrión AS, Toledano M, Monticelli F, Osorio R.
    J Dent; 2009 Jan; 37(1):52-8. PubMed ID: 18951675
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 17.