These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

199 related items for PubMed ID: 12742240

  • 1. Spatial spread of neural excitation in cochlear implant recipients: comparison of improved ECAP method and psychophysical forward masking.
    Cohen LT, Richardson LM, Saunders E, Cowan RS.
    Hear Res; 2003 May; 179(1-2):72-87. PubMed ID: 12742240
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. Spatial spread of neural excitation: comparison of compound action potential and forward-masking data in cochlear implant recipients.
    Cohen LT, Saunders E, Richardson LM.
    Int J Audiol; 2004 Jun; 43(6):346-55. PubMed ID: 15457817
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. Effect of stimulus and recording parameters on spatial spread of excitation and masking patterns obtained with the electrically evoked compound action potential in cochlear implants.
    Hughes ML, Stille LJ.
    Ear Hear; 2010 Oct; 31(5):679-92. PubMed ID: 20505513
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. Psychophysical versus physiological spatial forward masking and the relation to speech perception in cochlear implants.
    Hughes ML, Stille LJ.
    Ear Hear; 2008 Jun; 29(3):435-52. PubMed ID: 18344869
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. Electrophysiological spread of excitation and pitch perception for dual and single electrodes using the Nucleus Freedom cochlear implant.
    Busby PA, Battmer RD, Pesch J.
    Ear Hear; 2008 Dec; 29(6):853-64. PubMed ID: 18633324
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. Neural response telemetry reconsidered: II. The influence of neural population on the ECAP recovery function and refractoriness.
    Botros A, Psarros C.
    Ear Hear; 2010 Jun; 31(3):380-91. PubMed ID: 20090532
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. Channel interaction in cochlear implant users evaluated using the electrically evoked compound action potential.
    Abbas PJ, Hughes ML, Brown CJ, Miller CA, South H.
    Audiol Neurootol; 2004 Jun; 9(4):203-13. PubMed ID: 15205548
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. Electrically evoked compound action potentials are different depending on the site of cochlear stimulation.
    van de Heyning P, Arauz SL, Atlas M, Baumgartner WD, Caversaccio M, Chester-Browne R, Estienne P, Gavilan J, Godey B, Gstöttner W, Han D, Hagen R, Kompis M, Kuzovkov V, Lassaletta L, Lefevre F, Li Y, Müller J, Parnes L, Kleine Punte A, Raine C, Rajan G, Rivas A, Rivas JA, Royle N, Sprinzl G, Stephan K, Walkowiak A, Yanov Y, Zimmermann K, Zorowka P, Skarzynski H.
    Cochlear Implants Int; 2016 Nov; 17(6):251-262. PubMed ID: 27900916
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 10.