These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
Pubmed for Handhelds
PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS
Journal Abstract Search
387 related items for PubMed ID: 12748115
1. Prospective evaluation of carotid artery stenosis: elliptic centric contrast-enhanced MR angiography and spiral CT angiography compared with digital subtraction angiography. Alvarez-Linera J, Benito-León J, Escribano J, Campollo J, Gesto R. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol; 2003 May; 24(5):1012-9. PubMed ID: 12748115 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Carotid artery stenosis: prospective comparison of CT, three-dimensional gadolinium-enhanced MR, and conventional angiography. Randoux B, Marro B, Koskas F, Duyme M, Sahel M, Zouaoui A, Marsault C. Radiology; 2001 Jul; 220(1):179-85. PubMed ID: 11425993 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Internal carotid artery stenosis: accuracy of subjective visual impression for evaluation with digital subtraction angiography and contrast-enhanced MR angiography. U-King-Im JM, Graves MJ, Cross JJ, Higgins NJ, Wat J, Trivedi RA, Tang T, Howarth SP, Kirkpatrick PJ, Antoun NM, Gillard JH. Radiology; 2007 Jul; 244(1):213-22. PubMed ID: 17507721 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Multidirectional depiction of internal carotid arterial stenosis: three-dimensional time-of-flight MR angiography versus rotational and conventional digital subtraction angiography. Elgersma OE, Wüst AF, Buijs PC, van Der Graaf Y, Eikelboom BC, Mali WP. Radiology; 2000 Aug; 216(2):511-6. PubMed ID: 10924579 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Contrast-enhanced 3D MR angiography of the carotid artery: comparison with conventional digital subtraction angiography. Remonda L, Senn P, Barth A, Arnold M, Lövblad KO, Schroth G. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol; 2002 Feb; 23(2):213-9. PubMed ID: 11847044 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Carotid artery stenosis, occlusion, and pseudo-occlusion: first-pass, gadolinium-enhanced, three-dimensional MR angiography--preliminary study. Remonda L, Heid O, Schroth G. Radiology; 1998 Oct; 209(1):95-102. PubMed ID: 9769818 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Carotid artery stenosis: contrast-enhanced MR angiography with two different scan times compared with digital subtraction angiography. Sundgren PC, Sundén P, Lindgren A, Lanke J, Holtås S, Larsson EM. Neuroradiology; 2002 Jul; 44(7):592-9. PubMed ID: 12136361 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Diagnosis of carotid artery disease: preliminary experience with maximum-intensity-projection spiral CT angiography. Marks MP, Napel S, Jordan JE, Enzmann DR. AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1993 Jun; 160(6):1267-71. PubMed ID: 8498231 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Prospective evaluation of suspected stenoocclusive disease of the intracranial artery: combined MR angiography and CT angiography compared with digital subtraction angiography. Hirai T, Korogi Y, Ono K, Nagano M, Maruoka K, Uemura S, Takahashi M. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol; 2002 Jan; 23(1):93-101. PubMed ID: 11827880 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Carotid artery stenosis: intraindividual correlations of 3D time-of-flight MR angiography, contrast-enhanced MR angiography, conventional DSA, and rotational angiography for detection and grading. Anzalone N, Scomazzoni F, Castellano R, Strada L, Righi C, Politi LS, Kirchin MA, Chiesa R, Scotti G. Radiology; 2005 Jul; 236(1):204-13. PubMed ID: 15955853 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Spiral CT angiography and selective digital subtraction angiography of internal carotid artery stenosis. Link J, Brossmann J, Grabener M, Mueller-Huelsbeck S, Steffens JC, Brinkmann G, Heller M. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol; 1996 Jan; 17(1):89-94. PubMed ID: 8770255 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Accuracy of contrast-enhanced MR angiography in predicting angiographic stenosis of the internal carotid artery: linear regression analysis. Hathout GM, Duh MJ, El-Saden SM. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol; 2003 Oct; 24(9):1747-56. PubMed ID: 14561597 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Proximal great vessels of aortic arch: comparison of three-dimensional gadolinium-enhanced MR angiography and digital subtraction angiography. Randoux B, Marro B, Koskas F, Chiras J, Dormont D, Marsault C. Radiology; 2003 Dec; 229(3):697-702. PubMed ID: 14563902 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Preoperative evaluation of carotid artery stenosis: comparison of contrast-enhanced MR angiography and duplex sonography with digital subtraction angiography. Borisch I, Horn M, Butz B, Zorger N, Draganski B, Hoelscher T, Bogdahn U, Link J. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol; 2003 Dec; 24(6):1117-22. PubMed ID: 12812936 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Carotid stenosis: a comparison between MR and spiral CT angiography. Magarelli N, Scarabino T, Simeone AL, Florio F, Carriero A, Salvolini U, Bonomo L. Neuroradiology; 1998 Jun; 40(6):367-73. PubMed ID: 9689624 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Grading of carotid artery stenosis in the presence of extensive calcifications: dual-energy CT angiography in comparison with contrast-enhanced MR angiography. Korn A, Bender B, Brodoefel H, Hauser TK, Danz S, Ernemann U, Thomas C. Clin Neuroradiol; 2015 Mar; 25(1):33-40. PubMed ID: 24343701 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Evaluation of carotid artery stenosis: contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance angiography compared with conventional digital subtraction angiography. Goyal M, Nicol J, Gandhi D. Can Assoc Radiol J; 2004 Apr; 55(2):111-9. PubMed ID: 15131933 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Diagnostic accuracy of colour Doppler ultrasonography, CT angiography and blood-pool-enhanced MR angiography in assessing carotid stenosis: a comparative study with DSA in 170 patients. Anzidei M, Napoli A, Zaccagna F, Di Paolo P, Saba L, Cavallo Marincola B, Zini C, Cartocci G, Di Mare L, Catalano C, Passariello R. Radiol Med; 2012 Feb; 117(1):54-71. PubMed ID: 21424318 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. [Spiral CT angiography versus DSA in detection of carotid stenoses]. Link J, Müller-Hülsbeck S, Wesner F, Steffens JC, Brossmann J, Heller M. Zentralbl Chir; 1996 Feb; 121(12):1018-22. PubMed ID: 9092221 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] Page: [Next] [New Search]