These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

257 related items for PubMed ID: 1275008

  • 21. Report on the sue of the Dalkon Shield intrauterine device.
    Sadovsky E, Yarkoni S, Anteby SO.
    Contraception; 1974 Nov; 10(5):475-80. PubMed ID: 4448061
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 22. The Dalkon Shield.
    FDA Consum; 1975 Feb; 9(1):21. PubMed ID: 10308671
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 23. Letter: Intrauterine contraceptive devices.
    Watson DS.
    Med J Aust; 1974 May 18; 1(20):811. PubMed ID: 4852831
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 24. [The end of IUD marketing in the United States: what does it mean for American women?].
    Forrest JD.
    Contracept Fertil Sex (Paris); 1987 Mar 18; 15(3):291-300. PubMed ID: 12341479
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 25. Type of intrauterine device and the risk of pelvic inflammatory disease.
    Lee NC, Rubin GL, Ory HW, Burkman RT.
    Obstet Gynecol; 1983 Jul 18; 62(1):1-6. PubMed ID: 6856209
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 26. Translocation of the Dalkon Shield into the broad ligament.
    Cederqvist LL, Sarry ZI, Zervoudakis IA.
    Obstet Gynecol; 1975 Aug 18; 46(2):239-42. PubMed ID: 1171420
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 27. [The Dalkon shield. The infamous intrauterine device].
    Sandvei R, Bergsjø P.
    Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen; 1988 Jan 20; 108(2):151-4. PubMed ID: 3281317
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 28. Tubal infertility and the intrauterine device.
    Cramer DW, Schiff I, Schoenbaum SC, Gibson M, Belisle S, Albrecht B, Stillman RJ, Berger MJ, Wilson E, Stadel BV.
    N Engl J Med; 1985 Apr 11; 312(15):941-7. PubMed ID: 3974684
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 29. Epidemiology of pelvic inflammatory disease in parous women with special reference to intrauterine device use.
    Buchan H, Villard-Mackintosh L, Vessey M, Yeates D, McPherson K.
    Br J Obstet Gynaecol; 1990 Sep 11; 97(9):780-8. PubMed ID: 2242362
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 30.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 31.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 32.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 33. Letter: Dalkon shield and septic abortion.
    Briggs MH.
    Med J Aust; 1975 Jan 18; 1(3):81. PubMed ID: 1128373
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 34.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 35. Earth, motherhood, and the intrauterine device.
    Eschenbach DA.
    Fertil Steril; 1992 Jun 18; 57(6):1177-9. PubMed ID: 1601138
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 36. IUDs, inflammation, and infection: assessment after two decades of IUD use.
    Schmidt WA.
    Hum Pathol; 1982 Oct 18; 13(10):878-81. PubMed ID: 6751984
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 37. Early postpartum insertion of an intrauterine device.
    Emens JM, Gustafson RC, Jordan JA.
    Fertil Contracept; 1978 Jul 18; 2(3):38-41. PubMed ID: 12260722
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 38.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 39. Comparative randomized study of the copper-T 200 and Dalkon Shield intrauterine devices.
    Spellacy WN, Birk SA, Gordon L.
    Contraception; 1975 Oct 18; 12(4):453-63. PubMed ID: 1192734
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 40.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Previous] [Next] [New Search]
    of 13.