These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
Pubmed for Handhelds
PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS
Journal Abstract Search
403 related items for PubMed ID: 12761943
1. [The intraoperative application of neural response telemetry with the nucleus CI24M cochlear implant]. Yang H, Tang J, Cao K, Zhu X, Wang Y, Pan T. Zhonghua Er Bi Yan Hou Ke Za Zhi; 2001 Oct; 36(5):352-6. PubMed ID: 12761943 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Neural response telemetry with the nucleus CI24M cochlear implant. Shallop JK, Facer GW, Peterson A. Laryngoscope; 1999 Nov; 109(11):1755-9. PubMed ID: 10569402 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. [Electrically evoked compound action potential thresholds of pediatric cochlear implant recipients and its clinical application]. Xi X, Hong MD, Han DY, Huang DL, Yang WY. Zhonghua Er Bi Yan Hou Ke Za Zhi; 2003 Feb; 38(1):43-6. PubMed ID: 12778767 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. [Electrically evoked auditory nerve compound action potentials in Nucleus CI24M cochlear implant users]. Zhu X, Cao K, Pan T, Yang H, Wang Y. Lin Chuang Er Bi Yan Hou Ke Za Zhi; 2002 Jan; 16(1):5-8. PubMed ID: 11944479 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Electrophysiologic and objective monitoring of the cochlear implant during surgery: implementation, audit and outcomes. Mason S. Int J Audiol; 2004 Dec; 43 Suppl 1():S33-8. PubMed ID: 15732380 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Evaluation of a novel, noninvasive, objective test of auditory nerve function in cochlear implant candidates. Gräbel S, Hirschfelder A, Scheiber C, Olze H. Otol Neurotol; 2009 Sep; 30(6):716-24. PubMed ID: 19704358 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Electrode interaction in cochlear implant recipients: comparison of straight and contour electrode arrays. Xi X, Ji F, Han D, Hong M, Chen A. ORL J Otorhinolaryngol Relat Spec; 2009 Sep; 71(4):228-37. PubMed ID: 19707042 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. AutoNR: an automated system that measures ECAP thresholds with the Nucleus Freedom cochlear implant via machine intelligence. Botros A, van Dijk B, Killian M. Artif Intell Med; 2007 May; 40(1):15-28. PubMed ID: 16920343 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Effect of peri-modiolar cochlear implant positioning on auditory nerve responses: a neural response telemetry study. van Weert S, Stokroos RJ, Rikers MM, van Dijk P. Acta Otolaryngol; 2005 Jul; 125(7):725-31. PubMed ID: 16012034 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Using evoked compound action potentials to assess activation of electrodes and predict C-levels in the Tempo+ cochlear implant speech processor. Alvarez I, de la Torre A, Sainz M, Roldán C, Schoesser H, Spitzer P. Ear Hear; 2010 Feb; 31(1):134-45. PubMed ID: 19838116 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Modeling the relationship between psychophysical perception and electrically evoked compound action potential threshold in young cochlear implant recipients: clinical implications for implant fitting. Thai-Van H, Truy E, Charasse B, Boutitie F, Chanal JM, Cochard N, Piron JP, Ribas S, Deguine O, Fraysse B, Mondain M, Uziel A, Collet L. Clin Neurophysiol; 2004 Dec; 115(12):2811-24. PubMed ID: 15546789 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Differences between electrically evoked compound action potential (ECAP) and behavioral measures in children with cochlear implants operated in the school age vs. operated in the first years of life. Vlahović S, Šindija B, Aras I, Glunčić M, Trotić R. Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol; 2012 May; 76(5):731-9. PubMed ID: 22398117 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Electrically evoked amplitude modulation following response in cochlear implant candidates: comparison with auditory nerve response telemetry, subjective electrical stimulation, and speech perception. Hirschfelder A, Gräbel S, Olze H. Otol Neurotol; 2012 Aug; 33(6):968-75. PubMed ID: 22772009 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Correlation between NRT measurement and behavioural levels in patients with the Nucleus 24 cochlear implant. Di Nardo W, Ippolito S, Quaranta N, Cadoni G, Galli J. Acta Otorhinolaryngol Ital; 2003 Oct; 23(5):352-5. PubMed ID: 15108484 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Neural response telemetry in cochlear implant users. Kiss JG, Tóth F, Nagy AL, Jarabin J, Szamosközi A, Torkos A, Jóri J, Czigner J. Int Tinnitus J; 2003 Oct; 9(1):59-60. PubMed ID: 14763333 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Electrophysiological spread of excitation and pitch perception for dual and single electrodes using the Nucleus Freedom cochlear implant. Busby PA, Battmer RD, Pesch J. Ear Hear; 2008 Dec; 29(6):853-64. PubMed ID: 18633324 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. [Site of cochlear stimulation and its effect on electrically evoked compound action potentials using the Nucleus24 cochlear implants]. Tian Y, Li W, Wang Z, Yang N, Hui L, Jiang X. Lin Chuang Er Bi Yan Hou Tou Jing Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2012 Nov; 26(22):1014-6, 1019. PubMed ID: 23379111 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Evaluation of objective test techniques in cochlear implant users with inner ear malformations. Cinar BC, Atas A, Sennaroglu G, Sennaroglu L. Otol Neurotol; 2011 Sep; 32(7):1065-74. PubMed ID: 21817941 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Electrically evoked compound action potential (ECAP) in cochlear implant children: Changes in auditory nerve response in first year of cochlear implant use. Telmesani LM, Said NM. Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol; 2016 Mar; 82():28-33. PubMed ID: 26857311 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Packing of the cochleostomy site affects auditory nerve response thresholds in precurved off-stylet cochlear implants. Gordin A, Papsin B, Gordon K. Otol Neurotol; 2010 Feb; 31(2):204-9. PubMed ID: 20101160 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] Page: [Next] [New Search]