These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

462 related items for PubMed ID: 12762601

  • 1. A comparative study of plaque mutans streptococci levels in children receiving glass ionomer cement and amalgam restorations.
    Ertuğrul F, Eltem R, Eronat C.
    J Dent Child (Chic); 2003; 70(1):10-4. PubMed ID: 12762601
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. Class II glass ionomer/silver cermet restorations and their effect on interproximal growth of mutans streptococci.
    Berg JH, Farrell JE, Brown LR.
    Pediatr Dent; 1990 Feb; 12(1):20-3. PubMed ID: 2119036
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. Mutans streptococci in interproximal plaque from amalgam and glass ionomer restorations.
    Svanberg M, Krasse B, Ornerfeldt HO.
    Caries Res; 1990 Feb; 24(2):133-6. PubMed ID: 2111222
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. Mutans streptococci in plaque from margins of amalgam, composite, and glass-ionomer restorations.
    Svanberg M, Mjör IA, Orstavik D.
    J Dent Res; 1990 Mar; 69(3):861-4. PubMed ID: 2109000
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. Comparison of antibacterial activity of glass-ionomer cement and amalgam in class two restorations by Streptococcus mutans count analysis at fixed intervals: an in vivo study.
    Tegginmani VS, Goel B, Uppin V, Horatti P, Kumar LS, Nainani A.
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2013 May 01; 14(3):381-6. PubMed ID: 24171977
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. Clinical evaluation of glass ionomer-silver cermet restorations in primary molars: one year results.
    Hung TW, Richardson AS.
    J Can Dent Assoc; 1990 Mar 01; 56(3):239-40. PubMed ID: 2110027
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. Enamel remineralization on teeth adjacent to Class II glass ionomer restorations.
    Segura A, Donly KJ, Stratmann RG.
    Am J Dent; 1997 Oct 01; 10(5):247-50. PubMed ID: 9522700
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. Silver amalgam versus resin modified GIC class-II restorations in primary molars: twelve month clinical evaluation.
    Dutta BN, Gauba K, Tewari A, Chawla HS.
    J Indian Soc Pedod Prev Dent; 2001 Sep 01; 19(3):118-22. PubMed ID: 11817797
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. Amalgam, composite resin and glass ionomer cement in Class II restorations in primary molars--a three year clinical evaluation.
    Ostlund J, Möller K, Koch G.
    Swed Dent J; 1992 Sep 01; 16(3):81-6. PubMed ID: 1496459
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. Clinical evaluation of a compomer and an amalgam primary teeth class II restorations: a 2-year comparative study.
    Kavvadia K, Kakaboura A, Vanderas AP, Papagiannoulis L.
    Pediatr Dent; 2004 Sep 01; 26(3):245-50. PubMed ID: 15185806
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. Clinical and microbiological effects of different restorative materials on the periodontal tissues adjacent to subgingival class V restorations.
    Paolantonio M, D'ercole S, Perinetti G, Tripodi D, Catamo G, Serra E, Bruè C, Piccolomini R.
    J Clin Periodontol; 2004 Mar 01; 31(3):200-7. PubMed ID: 15016024
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. Class II amalgam restorations, glass-ionomer tunnel restorations, and caries development on adjacent tooth surfaces: a 3-year clinical study.
    Svanberg M.
    Caries Res; 1992 Mar 01; 26(4):315-8. PubMed ID: 1423449
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. Effect of luting cement on dental biofilm composition and secondary caries around metallic restorations in situ.
    Moura JS, Lima EM, Paes Leme AF, Del Bel Cury AA, Tabchoury CP, Cury JA.
    Oper Dent; 2004 Mar 01; 29(5):509-14. PubMed ID: 15470872
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. A comparison of glass cermet cement and amalgam restorations in primary molars.
    Hickel R, Voss A.
    ASDC J Dent Child; 1990 Mar 01; 57(3):184-8. PubMed ID: 2111833
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 24.