These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

467 related items for PubMed ID: 12763700

  • 1. A critique of Lilienfeld et al.'s (2000) "The scientific status of projective techniques".
    Hibbard S.
    J Pers Assess; 2003 Jun; 80(3):260-71. PubMed ID: 12763700
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. Weighing evidence for the Rorschach's validity: a response to Wood et al. (1999).
    Ganellen RJ.
    J Pers Assess; 2001 Aug; 77(1):1-15. PubMed ID: 11562095
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. On the science of Rorschach research.
    Meyer GJ.
    J Pers Assess; 2000 Aug; 75(1):46-81. PubMed ID: 10941702
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. Blind test interpretation to overcome student resistance to projective techniques courses.
    Rader GE, Schill TR.
    J Pers Assess; 1973 Jun; 37(3):213-6. PubMed ID: 4575075
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. [Using projective tests in forensic psychiatry may lead to wrong conclusions. Only empirically tested tests should be used].
    Trygg L, Dåderman AM, Wiklund N, Meurling AW, Lindgren M, Lidberg L, Levander S.
    Lakartidningen; 2001 Jun 27; 98(26-27):3118-23. PubMed ID: 11478205
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. Coming to grips with negative evidence for the Comprehensive System for the Rorschach: a comment on Gacono, Loving, and Bodholdt; Ganellen; and Bornstein.
    Wood JM, Lilienfeld SO, Nezworski MT, Garb HN.
    J Pers Assess; 2001 Aug 27; 77(1):48-70. PubMed ID: 11562104
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. Convergent validity of Rorschach and TAT scales of object relations.
    Ackerman SJ, Hilsenroth MJ, Clemence AJ, Weatherill R, Fowler JC.
    J Pers Assess; 2001 Oct 27; 77(2):295-306. PubMed ID: 11693860
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. Standards, accuracy, and questions of bias in Rorschach meta-analyses: reply to Wood, Garb, Nezworski, Lilienfeld, and Duke (2015).
    Mihura JL, Meyer GJ, Bombel G, Dumitrascu N.
    Psychol Bull; 2015 Jan 27; 141(1):250-260. PubMed ID: 25581288
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. The Rorschach Comprehensive System (CS) Psychometric Validity of Individual Variables.
    Tibon Czopp S, Zeligman R.
    J Pers Assess; 2016 Jan 27; 98(4):335-42. PubMed ID: 27153465
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. Rorschach Comprehensive System data for a sample of 517 adults from Spain (Barcelona).
    Campo V, Vilar N.
    J Pers Assess; 2007 Jan 27; 89 Suppl 1():S149-53. PubMed ID: 18039154
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. Projective methodologies.
    Molish HB.
    Annu Rev Psychol; 1972 Jan 27; 23():577-614. PubMed ID: 4552210
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. [Projective tests are reliable].
    Lindgren T, Janson H.
    Lakartidningen; 2000 Mar 08; 97(10):1160, 1163. PubMed ID: 10750389
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. Rorschach Comprehensive System data for a sample of 240 adult nonpatients from Japan.
    Nakamura N, Fuchigami Y, Tsugawa R.
    J Pers Assess; 2007 Mar 08; 89 Suppl 1():S97-102. PubMed ID: 18039178
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. Interobserver agreement, intraobserver reliability, and the Rorschach Comprehensive System.
    Acklin MW, McDowell CJ, Verschell MS, Chan D.
    J Pers Assess; 2000 Feb 08; 74(1):15-47. PubMed ID: 10779931
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. Differences of prefrontal cortex activity between picture-based personality tests: a near-infrared spectroscopy study.
    Hiraishi H, Haida M, Matsumoto M, Hayakawa N, Inomata S, Matsumoto H.
    J Pers Assess; 2012 Feb 08; 94(4):366-71. PubMed ID: 22439673
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. [Psychological changes in a group of tuberculous patients examined by projective tests (Rorschach and TAT)].
    SAMALE L.
    Arch Psicol Neurol Psichiatr; 1954 Feb 08; 15(4-5):397-436. PubMed ID: 13218931
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. The Scientific Status of Projective Techniques.
    Lilienfeld SO, Wood JM, Garb HN.
    Psychol Sci Public Interest; 2000 Nov 08; 1(2):27-66. PubMed ID: 26151980
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. The use of projective assessment techniques in pediatric research.
    Poster EC.
    J Pediatr Nurs; 1989 Feb 08; 4(1):26-35. PubMed ID: 2646424
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. Defining projective techniques: finding common ground for discourse.
    Wagner EE.
    Psychol Rep; 2003 Jun 08; 92(3 Pt 1):951-6. PubMed ID: 12841470
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. Rorschach Comprehensive System data for a sample of 150 adult nonpatients from Israel.
    Berant E.
    J Pers Assess; 2007 Jun 08; 89 Suppl 1():S67-73. PubMed ID: 18039172
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 24.