These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

211 related items for PubMed ID: 12766269

  • 1. [Canon's flat-panel detector].
    Matsumoto M, Sumida I, Ideguchi T, Kawaji Y, Himuro K.
    Igaku Butsuri; 2002; 22(4):232-45. PubMed ID: 12766269
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. [Hologic's Flat-Panel Detector].
    Ogata Y, Matsumoto M, Suekane K.
    Igaku Butsuri; 2002; 22(4):264-75. PubMed ID: 12766272
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. [Physical imaging properties of a flat panel X-ray detector system].
    Yoshida A, Nakamura S, Nishihara S, Kohama C, Takahata A, Fujikawa K.
    Igaku Butsuri; 2002; 22(4):246-54. PubMed ID: 12766270
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. [Flat-panel detector technology -State-of-the-art and future prospects-].
    Yamazaki T.
    Igaku Butsuri; 2002; 22(4):216-26. PubMed ID: 12766267
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. [An experience of the clinical study with angiography system using a Flat Panel Detector].
    Okusako K, Shogaki M, Yokoyama K, Ogawa T, Tanaka K, Ichida T, Kishimoto K, Hatagawa M, Okuyama K, Kudoh H, Tanaka S, Nakamura K, Ikeda S, Suzuki K.
    Igaku Butsuri; 2002; 22(4):255-63. PubMed ID: 12766271
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. An experimental comparison of flat-panel detector performance for direct and indirect systems (initial experiences and physical evaluation).
    Gomi T, Koshida K, Miyati T, Miyagawa J, Hirano H.
    J Digit Imaging; 2006 Dec; 19(4):362-70. PubMed ID: 16763929
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. [The experimental and clinical evaluation of digital chest radiography using FCR (Fuji Computed Radiography)].
    Oda J.
    Nihon Igaku Hoshasen Gakkai Zasshi; 1990 Dec 25; 50(12):1485-98. PubMed ID: 2089362
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. Chest radiography: a comparison of image quality and effective dose using four digital systems.
    Pascoal A, Lawinski CP, Mackenzie A, Tabakov S, Lewis CA.
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2005 Dec 25; 114(1-3):273-7. PubMed ID: 15933121
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. Dual-energy cardiac imaging: an image quality and dose comparison for a flat-panel detector and x-ray image intensifier.
    Ducote JL, Xu T, Molloi S.
    Phys Med Biol; 2007 Jan 07; 52(1):183-96. PubMed ID: 17183135
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. Imaging characteristics of an amorphous silicon flat-panel detector for digital chest radiography.
    Floyd CE, Warp RJ, Dobbins JT, Chotas HG, Baydush AH, Vargas-Voracek R, Ravin CE.
    Radiology; 2001 Mar 07; 218(3):683-8. PubMed ID: 11230640
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. [Chest radiography: ROC phantom study of four different digital systems and one conventional radiographic system].
    Redlich U, Reissberg S, Hoeschen C, Effenberger O, Fessel A, Preuss H, Scherlach C, Döhring W.
    Rofo; 2003 Jan 07; 175(1):38-45. PubMed ID: 12525979
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. Analysis of image quality in digital chest imaging.
    De Hauwere A, Bacher K, Smeets P, Verstraete K, Thierens H.
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2005 Jan 07; 117(1-3):174-7. PubMed ID: 16461499
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. Quality control phantom for flat panel detector X-ray systems.
    Chida K, Kaga Y, Haga Y, Takeda K, Zuguchi M.
    Health Phys; 2013 Jan 07; 104(1):97-101. PubMed ID: 23192093
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. [Comparison of four digital and one conventional radiographic image systems for the chest in a patient study with subsequent system optimization].
    Redlich U, Hoeschen C, Effenberger O, Fessel A, Preuss H, Reissberg S, Scherlach C, Döhring W.
    Rofo; 2005 Feb 07; 177(2):272-8. PubMed ID: 15666237
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. Experimental comparison of flat-panel detector performance for direct and indirect systems.
    Gomi T, Miyagawa J, Hirano H.
    Nihon Hoshasen Gijutsu Gakkai Zasshi; 2005 Dec 20; 61(12):1675-80. PubMed ID: 16395244
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. The evolution of digital radiography: from storage phosphors to flat-panel detectors.
    Porcelli A, Maggi F, Spalvieri S, Meduri A, Marano P.
    Rays; 2003 Dec 20; 28(1):5-12. PubMed ID: 14509175
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. Assessment and optimisation of the image quality of chest-radiography systems.
    Redlich U, Hoeschen C, Doehring W.
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2005 Dec 20; 114(1-3):264-8. PubMed ID: 15933119
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. A comparison of the performance of modern screen-film and digital mammography systems.
    Monnin P, Gutierrez D, Bulling S, Lepori D, Valley JF, Verdun FR.
    Phys Med Biol; 2005 Jun 07; 50(11):2617-31. PubMed ID: 15901958
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. Physical imaging properties and low-contrast performance of a newly developed flat-panel digital radiographic system.
    Matsumoto M, Yamazaki T, Nokita M, Hayashida S, Yoshida A, Ideguchi T, Himuro K, Ohki M, Kumazawa S, Higashida Y.
    Nihon Hoshasen Gijutsu Gakkai Zasshi; 2005 Dec 20; 61(12):1656-65. PubMed ID: 16395242
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 11.