These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

211 related items for PubMed ID: 12766269

  • 21. Imaging characteristics evaluation of a digital radiography system.
    Moro L, Pannella A, Bassetti C, Fantinato D, Baldi M, Bertoli G.
    Radiol Med; 2003; 106(1-2):94-102. PubMed ID: 12951556
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 22. [Digital radiography detector].
    Teng HL.
    Zhongguo Yi Liao Qi Xie Za Zhi; 2001 Jul; 25(4):234-6. PubMed ID: 12583226
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 23. [The spatial resolution of the digital storage phosphor system. The monitor and film compared].
    Nessi R, Castellana L, Paruccini N, Blanc M, Uslenghi CM.
    Radiol Med; 1995 Sep; 90(3):298-302. PubMed ID: 7501837
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 24. A comparison between objective and subjective image quality measurements for a full field digital mammography system.
    Marshall NW.
    Phys Med Biol; 2006 May 21; 51(10):2441-63. PubMed ID: 16675862
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 25. Physical image quality comparison of four types of digital detector for chest radiology.
    Fernandez JM, Ordiales JM, Guibelalde E, Prieto C, Vano E.
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2008 May 21; 129(1-3):140-3. PubMed ID: 18283060
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 26. Digital radiography: image quality and radiation dose.
    Seibert JA.
    Health Phys; 2008 Nov 21; 95(5):586-98. PubMed ID: 18849693
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 27. Technical assessment of 2D and 3D imaging performance of an IGZO-based flat-panel X-ray detector.
    Sheth NM, Uneri A, Helm PA, Zbijewski W, Siewerdsen JH.
    Med Phys; 2022 May 21; 49(5):3053-3066. PubMed ID: 35363391
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 28. An examination of automatic exposure control regimes for two digital radiography systems.
    Marshall NW.
    Phys Med Biol; 2009 Aug 07; 54(15):4645-70. PubMed ID: 19590115
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 29. Evaluation of new image processing conditions for digital mammograms from Fuji computed radiography.
    Kano H, Endo T, Ikeda M, Oiwa M, Ishigaki T.
    Nagoya J Med Sci; 2006 Jun 07; 68(3-4):131-8. PubMed ID: 16967779
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 30. [Flat Panel Detector Philips introduced and its system direction].
    Yamada S.
    Igaku Butsuri; 2002 Jun 07; 22(4):227-31. PubMed ID: 12766268
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 31. [Investigation of image quality identification utilizing physical image quality measurement in direct- and indirect-type of flat panel detectors and computed radiography].
    Yokoi T, Takata T, Ichikawa K.
    Nihon Hoshasen Gijutsu Gakkai Zasshi; 2011 Jun 07; 67(11):1415-25. PubMed ID: 22104233
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 32. [New computed radiography technologies in digital radiography].
    Fasbender R, Schaetzing R.
    Radiologe; 2003 May 07; 43(5):367-73. PubMed ID: 12764585
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 33. [Comparison of noise characteristics of direct and indirect conversion flat panel detectors].
    Murai M, Kishimoto K, Tanaka K, Oota K, Ienaga A.
    Nihon Hoshasen Gijutsu Gakkai Zasshi; 2010 Nov 20; 66(11):1443-8. PubMed ID: 21099174
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 34. Is the image quality of conventional chest radiography obtained from a two-layer flat panel detector affected by the internal structure of the detector?
    Takarabe S, Kuramoto T, Shibayama Y, Yamasaki Y, Kitamura Y, Yoshikawa H, Kato T.
    Phys Med; 2022 Mar 20; 95():176-181. PubMed ID: 35219067
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 35. Comparison of technical and anatomical noise in digital thorax X-ray images.
    Hoeschen C, Tischenko O, Buhr E, Illers H.
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2005 Mar 20; 114(1-3):75-80. PubMed ID: 15933084
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 36. [Imaging quality of a digital Konica Regius 336 system for thoracic radiology].
    Ostinelli A, Frigerio M, Monti AF, Gelosa S, Tognoli P, Perniola N, Gozzi G.
    Radiol Med; 2000 Jun 20; 99(6):465-8. PubMed ID: 11262825
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 37. [The amorphous selenium based flat-panel detector. Clinical experiences].
    Schmidt EL, Herbig W.
    Radiologe; 2003 May 20; 43(5):374-8. PubMed ID: 12764586
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 38. [Image quality and exposure dose in digital projection radiography].
    Busch HP, Busch S, Decker C, Schilz C.
    Rofo; 2003 Jan 20; 175(1):32-7. PubMed ID: 12525978
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 39. [The physical aspects of traditional radiology and of computed radiology compared].
    Bacarini L, Giacomich R, Saccavini C.
    Radiol Med; 1995 Apr 20; 89(4):506-19. PubMed ID: 7597234
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 40. Investigation of image lag and modulation transfer function in fluoroscopy images obtained with a dynamic flat-panel detector.
    Kawashima H, Tanaka R, Ichikawa K, Matsubara K, Iida H, Sanada S.
    Radiol Phys Technol; 2013 Jul 20; 6(2):367-74. PubMed ID: 23568338
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Previous] [Next] [New Search]
    of 11.