These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
22. Detective quantum efficiency measured as a function of energy for two full-field digital mammography systems. Marshall NW. Phys Med Biol; 2009 May 07; 54(9):2845-61. PubMed ID: 19384004 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
23. Quality control phantom for flat panel detector X-ray systems. Chida K, Kaga Y, Haga Y, Takeda K, Zuguchi M. Health Phys; 2013 Jan 07; 104(1):97-101. PubMed ID: 23192093 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
26. Optimal beam quality for chest flat panel detector system: realistic phantom study. Kuwahara C, Aoki T, Oda N, Kawabata J, Sugimoto K, Kobayashi M, Fujii M, Korogi Y. Eur Radiol; 2019 Sep 07; 29(9):4538-4543. PubMed ID: 30737566 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
27. Comparison of technical and anatomical noise in digital thorax X-ray images. Hoeschen C, Tischenko O, Buhr E, Illers H. Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2005 Sep 07; 114(1-3):75-80. PubMed ID: 15933084 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
28. Physical image quality comparison of four types of digital detector for chest radiology. Fernandez JM, Ordiales JM, Guibelalde E, Prieto C, Vano E. Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2008 Sep 07; 129(1-3):140-3. PubMed ID: 18283060 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
31. Physical characterization of a high-resolution CCD detector for mammography. Elbakri IA, Tesic MM, Xiong Q. Phys Med Biol; 2007 Apr 21; 52(8):2171-83. PubMed ID: 17404462 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
32. A comparison of the performance of modern screen-film and digital mammography systems. Monnin P, Gutierrez D, Bulling S, Lepori D, Valley JF, Verdun FR. Phys Med Biol; 2005 Jun 07; 50(11):2617-31. PubMed ID: 15901958 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
33. DQE analysis on a dual detector phase x-ray imaging system. Zhang D, Liu H, Wu X. Phys Med Biol; 2008 Sep 21; 53(18):5165-76. PubMed ID: 18723931 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
35. [The experimental and clinical evaluation of digital chest radiography using FCR (Fuji Computed Radiography)]. Oda J. Nihon Igaku Hoshasen Gakkai Zasshi; 1990 Dec 25; 50(12):1485-98. PubMed ID: 2089362 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
36. [Present state and future of flat panel detector in Japan]. Higashida Y. Igaku Butsuri; 2002 Dec 25; 22(4):210-5. PubMed ID: 12766266 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
37. [Report based on fiscal 2010 diagnostic X-ray equipment questionnaire survey (conditions of radiography)]. Koyano Y, Ide T, Tsukamoto A, Ochiai K, Miyake H, Okuyama T, Miyazaki S. Nihon Hoshasen Gijutsu Gakkai Zasshi; 2015 Apr 25; 71(4):348-55. PubMed ID: 25892422 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
38. On site evaluation of three flat panel detectors for digital radiography. Borasi G, Nitrosi A, Ferrari P, Tassoni D. Med Phys; 2003 Jul 25; 30(7):1719-31. PubMed ID: 12906189 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
39. [Investigation of beam quality for digital chest radiography with RbBr:Tl(+) photostimulable storage phosphors]. Kawata H. Nihon Hoshasen Gijutsu Gakkai Zasshi; 2003 Sep 25; 59(9):1174-82. PubMed ID: 14593331 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
40. Basic imaging properties of a computed radiographic system with photostimulable phosphors. Fujita H, Ueda K, Morishita J, Fujikawa T, Ohtsuka A, Sai T. Med Phys; 1989 Sep 25; 16(1):52-9. PubMed ID: 2921980 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] Page: [Previous] [Next] [New Search]