These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

148 related items for PubMed ID: 12766271

  • 21. Dose performance evaluation of a charge coupled device and a flat-panel digital fluoroscopy system recently installed in an interventional cardiology laboratory.
    Tsapaki V, Kottou S, Kollaros N, Dafnomili P, Kyriakidis Z, Neofotistou V.
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2004; 111(3):297-304. PubMed ID: 15266080
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 22. Therapeutic angiographic procedures: differences in dose area product between analog image intensifier and digital flat panel detector.
    Spira D, Kirchner S, Blumenstock G, Herz K, Ketelsen D, Wiskirchen J, Wiesinger B.
    Acta Radiol; 2016 May; 57(5):587-94. PubMed ID: 26231951
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 23. Physical imaging properties and low-contrast performance of a newly developed flat-panel digital radiographic system.
    Matsumoto M, Yamazaki T, Nokita M, Hayashida S, Yoshida A, Ideguchi T, Himuro K, Ohki M, Kumazawa S, Higashida Y.
    Nihon Hoshasen Gijutsu Gakkai Zasshi; 2005 Dec 20; 61(12):1656-65. PubMed ID: 16395242
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 24. The evolution of digital radiography: from storage phosphors to flat-panel detectors.
    Porcelli A, Maggi F, Spalvieri S, Meduri A, Marano P.
    Rays; 2003 Dec 20; 28(1):5-12. PubMed ID: 14509175
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 25.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 26.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 27. Flat-panel detectors: how much better are they?
    Seibert JA.
    Pediatr Radiol; 2006 Sep 20; 36 Suppl 2(Suppl 2):173-81. PubMed ID: 16862412
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 28.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 29.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 30. A Rotatable Quality Control Phantom for Evaluating the Performance of Flat Panel Detectors in Imaging Moving Objects.
    Haga Y, Chida K, Inaba Y, Kaga Y, Meguro T, Zuguchi M.
    J Digit Imaging; 2016 Feb 20; 29(1):38-42. PubMed ID: 26264731
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 31. CCD-based X-ray area detector for time-resolved diffraction experiments.
    Yagi N, Inoue K, Oka T.
    J Synchrotron Radiat; 2004 Nov 01; 11(Pt 6):456-61. PubMed ID: 15496732
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 32.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 33.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 34.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 35. Comparison of a CCD and a flat-panel digital system in an Interventional Cardiology Laboratory.
    Tsapaki V, Kottou S, Kollaros N, Kyriakidis Z, Neofotistou V.
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2005 Nov 01; 117(1-3):93-6. PubMed ID: 16461500
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 36. Physical evaluation of prototype high-performance anti-scatter grids: potential for improved digital radiographic image quality.
    Fetterly KA, Schueler BA.
    Phys Med Biol; 2009 Jan 21; 54(2):N37-42. PubMed ID: 19098352
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 37. [Analysis of the automatic brightness controlling for x-ray imaging systems].
    Huang YL, Qu T, Lu KL, Pan ZZ.
    Zhongguo Yi Liao Qi Xie Za Zhi; 2002 Nov 21; 26(6):402-6. PubMed ID: 16104315
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 38. [A study of digital x-ray detection systems with optical image transfer].
    Kanter BM, Vladimirov LV, Lygin VA, Medvedeva NA, Chuliukov GI.
    Med Tekh; 2006 Nov 21; (5):42-5. PubMed ID: 17133947
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 39. [Comparison of noise characteristics of direct and indirect conversion flat panel detectors].
    Murai M, Kishimoto K, Tanaka K, Oota K, Ienaga A.
    Nihon Hoshasen Gijutsu Gakkai Zasshi; 2010 Nov 20; 66(11):1443-8. PubMed ID: 21099174
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 40. Clinically useful dilution factors for iodine and gadolinium contrast material: an animal model of pediatric digital subtraction angiography using state-of-the-art flat-panel detectors.
    Racadio JM, Kashinkunti SR, Nachabe RA, Racadio JM, Johnson ND, Kukreja KU, Patel MN, Privitera MB, Hales JE, Abruzzo TA.
    Pediatr Radiol; 2013 Nov 20; 43(11):1491-501. PubMed ID: 23736781
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Previous] [Next] [New Search]
    of 8.