These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search


96 related items for PubMed ID: 12767878

  • 1. Correlation of biomechanical stiffness with plain radiographic and ultrasound data in an experimental mandibular distraction wound.
    Kaban LB, Thurmüller P, Troulis MJ, Glowacki J, Wahl D, Linke B, Rahn B, Perrott DH.
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2003 Jun; 32(3):296-304. PubMed ID: 12767878
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. Development of a mechanical testing system for a mandibular distraction wound.
    Perrott DH, Rahn B, Wahl D, Linke B, Thurüller P, Troulis M, Glowacki J, Kaban LB.
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2003 Oct; 32(5):523-7. PubMed ID: 14759112
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. Histomorphometric analysis of the porcine mandibular distraction wound.
    Lawler ME, Tayebaty FT, Williams WB, Troulis MJ, Kaban LB.
    J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2010 Jul; 68(7):1543-54. PubMed ID: 20561467
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. Acceleration of callus maturation using rhOP-1 in mandibular distraction osteogenesis in a rat model.
    Terheyden H, Wang H, Warnke PH, Springer I, Erxleben A, Ludwig K, Rueger DC.
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2003 Oct; 32(5):528-33. PubMed ID: 14759113
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. Comparative evaluation of the mandibular distraction zone using ultrasonography and conventional radiography.
    Issar Y, Sahoo NK, Sinha R, Satija L, Chattopadhyay PK.
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2014 May; 43(5):587-94. PubMed ID: 24393569
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. The effect of ultrasound on osteogenesis in the vertically distracted edentulous mandible: a double-blind trial.
    Schortinghuis J, Bronckers AL, Gravendeel J, Stegenga B, Raghoebar GM.
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2008 Nov; 37(11):1014-21. PubMed ID: 18757179
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. Effects of latency and rate on bone formation in a porcine mandibular distraction model.
    Troulis MJ, Glowacki J, Perrott DH, Kaban LB.
    J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2000 May; 58(5):507-13; discussion 514. PubMed ID: 10800906
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. The influence of expansion rates on mandibular distraction osteogenesis: a computational analysis.
    Boccaccio A, Pappalettere C, Kelly DJ.
    Ann Biomed Eng; 2007 Nov; 35(11):1940-60. PubMed ID: 17768683
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]


    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 5.