These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

111 related items for PubMed ID: 12768482

  • 1. Correlation between femoral neck version and strain on the femur after insertion of femoral prosthesis.
    Umeda N, Saito M, Sugano N, Ohzono K, Nishii T, Sakai T, Yoshikawa H, Ikeda D, Murakami A.
    J Orthop Sci; 2003; 8(3):381-6. PubMed ID: 12768482
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. [Noncemented total hip arthroplasty: influence of extramedullary parameters on initial implant stability and on bone-implant interface stresses].
    Ramaniraka NA, Rakotomanana LR, Rubin PJ, Leyvraz P.
    Rev Chir Orthop Reparatrice Appar Mot; 2000 Oct; 86(6):590-7. PubMed ID: 11060433
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. Patterns of stress distribution at the proximal femur after implantation of a modular neck prosthesis. A biomechanical study.
    Politis AN, Siogkas GK, Gelalis ID, Xenakis TA.
    Clin Biomech (Bristol); 2013 Apr; 28(4):415-22. PubMed ID: 23466056
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. Experimental evaluation of new concepts in hip arthroplasty.
    Wik TS.
    Acta Orthop Suppl; 2012 Apr; 83(345):1-26. PubMed ID: 22489909
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. Increased strain in the femoral neck following insertion of a resurfacing femoral prosthesis.
    Wik TS, Østbyhaug PO, Klaksvik J, Aamodt A.
    J Bone Joint Surg Br; 2010 Mar; 92(3):461-7. PubMed ID: 20190322
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. Optimizing femoral anteversion and offset after total hip arthroplasty, using a modular femoral neck system: an experimental study.
    Sakai T, Sugano N, Nishii T, Haraguchi K, Ochi T, Ohzono K.
    J Orthop Sci; 2000 Mar; 5(5):489-94. PubMed ID: 11180907
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. Position of hip resurfacing component affects strain and resistance to fracture in the femoral neck.
    Vail TP, Glisson RR, Dominguez DE, Kitaoka K, Ottaviano D.
    J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2008 Sep; 90(9):1951-60. PubMed ID: 18762656
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. Modular neck for prevention of prosthetic impingement in cases with excessively anteverted femur.
    Miki H, Sugano N.
    Clin Biomech (Bristol); 2011 Nov; 26(9):944-9. PubMed ID: 21680069
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. Deformation pattern and load transfer of an uncemented femoral stem with modular necks. An experimental study in human cadaver femurs.
    Enoksen CH, Gjerdet NR, Klaksvik J, Arthursson AJ, Schnell-Husby O, Wik TS.
    Clin Biomech (Bristol); 2016 Feb; 32():28-33. PubMed ID: 26785385
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. Biomechanical analysis and quantitative analysis of bone scintigraphy on thrust plate hip prosthesis.
    Goto T, Yasunaga Y, Takahashi K, Ochi M.
    Arch Orthop Trauma Surg; 2004 Jul; 124(6):357-62. PubMed ID: 15108008
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. The impact of proximal femoral morphology on failure strength with a mid-head resection short-stem hip arthroplasty.
    Olsen M, Al Saied M, Morison Z, Sellan M, Waddell JP, Schemitsch EH.
    Proc Inst Mech Eng H; 2014 Dec; 228(12):1275-80. PubMed ID: 25515228
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. In vitro testing of the deformation pattern and initial stability of a cementless stem coupled to an experimental femoral head, with increased offset and altered femoral neck angles.
    Wik TS, Enoksen C, Klaksvik J, Østbyhaug PO, Foss OA, Ludvigsen J, Aamodt A.
    Proc Inst Mech Eng H; 2011 Aug; 225(8):797-808. PubMed ID: 21922956
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. Femoral bone loss following hip replacement. A comparative study.
    Pritchett JW.
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 1995 May; (314):156-61. PubMed ID: 7634629
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. X-ray image review of the bone remodeling around an osseointegrated trans-femoral implant and a finite element simulation case study.
    Xu W, Robinson K.
    Ann Biomed Eng; 2008 Mar; 36(3):435-43. PubMed ID: 18197477
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. Comparison of periprosthetic bone remodelling after implantation of anatomic and straight stem prostheses in total hip arthroplasty.
    Grochola LF, Habermann B, Mastrodomenico N, Kurth A.
    Arch Orthop Trauma Surg; 2008 Apr; 128(4):383-92. PubMed ID: 18038142
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. The biomechanical effect of anteversion and modular neck offset on stress shielding for short-stem versus conventional long-stem hip implants.
    Goshulak P, Samiezadeh S, Aziz MS, Bougherara H, Zdero R, Schemitsch EH.
    Med Eng Phys; 2016 Mar; 38(3):232-40. PubMed ID: 26774671
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. Will stress shielding limit the longevity of cemented femoral components of total hip replacement?
    Harris WH.
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 1992 Jan; (274):120-3. PubMed ID: 1728997
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. Strain distribution in the proximal femur with flexible composite and metallic femoral components under axial and torsional loads.
    Otani T, Whiteside LA, White SE.
    J Biomed Mater Res; 1993 May; 27(5):575-85. PubMed ID: 8314810
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 6.