These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

386 related items for PubMed ID: 12774792

  • 1.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. Lengthening the stem: allowing federally funded researchers to derive human pluripotent stem cells from embryos.
    Casell JH.
    Univ Mich J Law Reform; 2001; 34(3):547-72. PubMed ID: 16538744
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. The stem cell debate: the legal, political and ethical issues surrounding federal funding of scientific research on human embryos.
    George EP.
    Albany Law J Sci Technol; 2002; 12(2):747-803. PubMed ID: 15212013
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. Stem cell research: is the law preventing progress?
    Enmon JL.
    Utah Law Rev; 2002; (3):621-48. PubMed ID: 15156897
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. Misapplied ethical considerations: U.S. federal stem cell mandates lack global focus and market foresight.
    Fowler HL.
    Cornell Int Law J; 2004; 36(3):521-44. PubMed ID: 16602208
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. Embryonic stem cell research controversy: focus on the private sector and international sphere.
    Kim S.
    Hastings Womens Law J; 2003; 14(1):89-108. PubMed ID: 16032810
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. The intersection of law and medicine: the case for providing federal funding for embryonic stem cell research.
    Newhart AB.
    Villanova Law Rev; 2004; 49(2):329-61. PubMed ID: 16485376
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. Examining disputes over ownership rights to frozen embryos: will prior consent documents survive if challenged by state law and/or constitutional principles?
    Sheinbach DM.
    Cathol Univers Law Rev; 1999; 48(3):989-1027. PubMed ID: 12611403
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. Washington insider: federal funding for embryonic stem cell research.
    Doerflinger RM.
    Natl Cathol Bioeth Q; 2005; 5(3):455-62. PubMed ID: 16425497
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. Rights of embryo and foetus in private law.
    Jost TS.
    Am J Comp Law; 2002; 50(3):633-46. PubMed ID: 15212066
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. Lives of the embryo.
    Christ Century; 2005 Jun 28; 122(13):5. PubMed ID: 16206452
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. Specially respecting the living human embryo by adhering to standard human subject experimentation rules.
    Casey SB, Adams NA.
    Yale J Health Policy Law Ethics; 2001 Jun 28; 2(1):109, 111-41. PubMed ID: 12664939
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. Embryo stem-cell work gets NIH go-ahead.
    Smaglik P.
    Nature; 2000 Aug 31; 406(6799):925. PubMed ID: 10984022
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 20.