These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

290 related items for PubMed ID: 12778767

  • 1. [Electrically evoked compound action potential thresholds of pediatric cochlear implant recipients and its clinical application].
    Xi X, Hong MD, Han DY, Huang DL, Yang WY.
    Zhonghua Er Bi Yan Hou Ke Za Zhi; 2003 Feb; 38(1):43-6. PubMed ID: 12778767
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. Using evoked compound action potentials to assess activation of electrodes and predict C-levels in the Tempo+ cochlear implant speech processor.
    Alvarez I, de la Torre A, Sainz M, Roldán C, Schoesser H, Spitzer P.
    Ear Hear; 2010 Feb; 31(1):134-45. PubMed ID: 19838116
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. Evaluation of a novel, noninvasive, objective test of auditory nerve function in cochlear implant candidates.
    Gräbel S, Hirschfelder A, Scheiber C, Olze H.
    Otol Neurotol; 2009 Sep; 30(6):716-24. PubMed ID: 19704358
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. AutoNR: an automated system that measures ECAP thresholds with the Nucleus Freedom cochlear implant via machine intelligence.
    Botros A, van Dijk B, Killian M.
    Artif Intell Med; 2007 May; 40(1):15-28. PubMed ID: 16920343
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. The relationship between the intraoperative ECAP threshold and postoperative behavioral levels: the difference between postlingually deafened adults and prelingually deafened pediatric cochlear implant users.
    Morita T, Naito Y, Hirai T, Yamaguchi S, Ito J.
    Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol; 2003 Feb; 260(2):67-72. PubMed ID: 12582781
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. Clinical results of AutoNRT, a completely automatic ECAP recording system for cochlear implants.
    van Dijk B, Botros AM, Battmer RD, Begall K, Dillier N, Hey M, Lai WK, Lenarz T, Laszig R, Morsnowski A, Müller-Deile J, Psarros C, Shallop J, Weber B, Wesarg T, Zarowski A, Offeciers E.
    Ear Hear; 2007 Aug; 28(4):558-70. PubMed ID: 17609616
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. Electrically evoked amplitude modulation following response in cochlear implant candidates: comparison with auditory nerve response telemetry, subjective electrical stimulation, and speech perception.
    Hirschfelder A, Gräbel S, Olze H.
    Otol Neurotol; 2012 Aug; 33(6):968-75. PubMed ID: 22772009
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. Electrically evoked compound action potential (ECAP) in cochlear implant children: Changes in auditory nerve response in first year of cochlear implant use.
    Telmesani LM, Said NM.
    Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol; 2016 Mar; 82():28-33. PubMed ID: 26857311
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. Practical model description of peripheral neural excitation in cochlear implant recipients: 1. Growth of loudness and ECAP amplitude with current.
    Cohen LT.
    Hear Res; 2009 Jan; 247(2):87-99. PubMed ID: 19063956
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. Packing of the cochleostomy site affects auditory nerve response thresholds in precurved off-stylet cochlear implants.
    Gordin A, Papsin B, Gordon K.
    Otol Neurotol; 2010 Feb; 31(2):204-9. PubMed ID: 20101160
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. A comparison of intra- versus post-operatively acquired electrically evoked compound action potentials.
    van Wermeskerken GK, van Olphen AF, van Zanten GA.
    Int J Audiol; 2006 Oct; 45(10):589-94. PubMed ID: 17062500
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. Neural response telemetry with the nucleus CI24M cochlear implant.
    Shallop JK, Facer GW, Peterson A.
    Laryngoscope; 1999 Nov; 109(11):1755-9. PubMed ID: 10569402
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. Electrical compound action potentials recorded with automated neural response telemetry: threshold changes as a function of time and electrode position.
    Spivak L, Auerbach C, Vambutas A, Geshkovich S, Wexler L, Popecki B.
    Ear Hear; 2011 Feb; 32(1):104-13. PubMed ID: 20686409
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. Normative findings of electrically evoked compound action potential measurements using the neural response telemetry of the Nucleus CI24M cochlear implant system.
    Cafarelli Dees D, Dillier N, Lai WK, von Wallenberg E, van Dijk B, Akdas F, Aksit M, Batman C, Beynon A, Burdo S, Chanal JM, Collet L, Conway M, Coudert C, Craddock L, Cullington H, Deggouj N, Fraysse B, Grabel S, Kiefer J, Kiss JG, Lenarz T, Mair A, Maune S, Müller-Deile J, Piron JP, Razza S, Tasche C, Thai-Van H, Toth F, Truy E, Uziel A, Smoorenburg GF.
    Audiol Neurootol; 2005 Feb; 10(2):105-16. PubMed ID: 15650302
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 15.