These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search


281 related items for PubMed ID: 12782855

  • 1. Biomechanical evaluation of posterior screw fixation in cadaveric cervical spines.
    Papagelopoulos PJ, Currier BL, Neale PG, Hokari Y, Berglund LJ, Larson DR, Fisher DR, An KN.
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2003 Jun; (411):13-24. PubMed ID: 12782855
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. Cervical stability with lateral mass plating: unicortical versus bicortical screw purchase.
    Muffoletto AJ, Yang J, Vadhva M, Hadjipavlou AG.
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2003 Apr 15; 28(8):778-81. PubMed ID: 12698120
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. Biomechanical comparison of two-level cervical locking posterior screw/rod and hook/rod techniques.
    Espinoza-Larios A, Ames CP, Chamberlain RH, Sonntag VK, Dickman CA, Crawford NR.
    Spine J; 2007 Apr 15; 7(2):194-204. PubMed ID: 17321969
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. Biomechanical consequences of cervical spondylectomy versus corpectomy.
    Doğan S, Baek S, Sonntag VK, Crawford NR.
    Neurosurgery; 2008 Oct 15; 63(4 Suppl 2):303-8; discussion 308. PubMed ID: 18981835
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. Biomechanical evaluation of occipitocervicothoracic fusion: impact of partial or sequential fixation.
    Cheng BC, Hafez MA, Cunningham B, Serhan H, Welch WC.
    Spine J; 2008 Oct 15; 8(5):821-6. PubMed ID: 17981098
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. Biomechanical evaluation of new posterior occipitocervical instrumentation system.
    Currier BL, Papagelopoulos PJ, Neale PG, Andreshak JL, Hokari Y, Berglund LJ, Larson DR, Fisher DR, An KN.
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2003 Jun 15; (411):103-15. PubMed ID: 12782865
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. Biomechanical differences between transfacet and lateral mass screw-rod constructs for multilevel posterior cervical spine stabilization.
    Miyanji F, Mahar A, Oka R, Newton P.
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2008 Nov 01; 33(23):E865-9. PubMed ID: 18978579
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. Biomechanical assessment of anterior lumbar interbody fusion with an anterior lumbosacral fixation screw-plate: comparison to stand-alone anterior lumbar interbody fusion and anterior lumbar interbody fusion with pedicle screws in an unstable human cadaver model.
    Gerber M, Crawford NR, Chamberlain RH, Fifield MS, LeHuec JC, Dickman CA.
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2006 Apr 01; 31(7):762-8. PubMed ID: 16582849
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. Biomechanical comparison of cervical spine reconstructive techniques after a multilevel corpectomy of the cervical spine.
    Singh K, Vaccaro AR, Kim J, Lorenz EP, Lim TH, An HS.
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2003 Oct 15; 28(20):2352-8; discussion 2358. PubMed ID: 14560082
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. Pedicle screws enhance primary stability in multilevel cervical corpectomies: biomechanical in vitro comparison of different implants including constrained and nonconstrained posterior instumentations.
    Schmidt R, Wilke HJ, Claes L, Puhl W, Richter M.
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2003 Aug 15; 28(16):1821-8. PubMed ID: 12923469
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. The biomechanical effect of transverse connectors use in a pre- and postlaminectomy model of the posterior cervical spine: an in vitro cadaveric study.
    Majid K, Gudipally M, Hussain M, Moldavsky M, Khalil S.
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2011 Dec 15; 36(26):E1694-701. PubMed ID: 21681141
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. Biomechanical comparison of four C1 to C2 rigid fixative techniques: anterior transarticular, posterior transarticular, C1 to C2 pedicle, and C1 to C2 intralaminar screws.
    Lapsiwala SB, Anderson PA, Oza A, Resnick DK.
    Neurosurgery; 2006 Mar 15; 58(3):516-21; discussion 516-21. PubMed ID: 16528192
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. Biomechanical comparison of occiput-C1-C2 fixation techniques: C0-C1 transarticular screw and direct occiput condyle screw.
    Takigawa T, Simon P, Espinoza Orías AA, Hong JT, Ito Y, Inoue N, An HS.
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2012 May 20; 37(12):E696-701. PubMed ID: 22158063
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. Posterior-only stabilization of 2-column and 3-column injuries at the cervicothoracic junction: a biomechanical study.
    O'Brien JR, Dmitriev AE, Yu W, Gelb D, Ludwig S.
    J Spinal Disord Tech; 2009 Jul 20; 22(5):340-6. PubMed ID: 19525789
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. A new stand-alone cervical anterior interbody fusion device: biomechanical comparison with established anterior cervical fixation devices.
    Scholz M, Reyes PM, Schleicher P, Sawa AG, Baek S, Kandziora F, Marciano FF, Crawford NR.
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2009 Jan 15; 34(2):156-60. PubMed ID: 19139665
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]


    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 15.