These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
2. Cervical stability with lateral mass plating: unicortical versus bicortical screw purchase. Muffoletto AJ, Yang J, Vadhva M, Hadjipavlou AG. Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2003 Apr 15; 28(8):778-81. PubMed ID: 12698120 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Biomechanical comparison of two-level cervical locking posterior screw/rod and hook/rod techniques. Espinoza-Larios A, Ames CP, Chamberlain RH, Sonntag VK, Dickman CA, Crawford NR. Spine J; 2007 Apr 15; 7(2):194-204. PubMed ID: 17321969 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Biomechanical consequences of cervical spondylectomy versus corpectomy. Doğan S, Baek S, Sonntag VK, Crawford NR. Neurosurgery; 2008 Oct 15; 63(4 Suppl 2):303-8; discussion 308. PubMed ID: 18981835 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Biomechanical evaluation of occipitocervicothoracic fusion: impact of partial or sequential fixation. Cheng BC, Hafez MA, Cunningham B, Serhan H, Welch WC. Spine J; 2008 Oct 15; 8(5):821-6. PubMed ID: 17981098 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Biomechanical evaluation of new posterior occipitocervical instrumentation system. Currier BL, Papagelopoulos PJ, Neale PG, Andreshak JL, Hokari Y, Berglund LJ, Larson DR, Fisher DR, An KN. Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2003 Jun 15; (411):103-15. PubMed ID: 12782865 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Biomechanical differences between transfacet and lateral mass screw-rod constructs for multilevel posterior cervical spine stabilization. Miyanji F, Mahar A, Oka R, Newton P. Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2008 Nov 01; 33(23):E865-9. PubMed ID: 18978579 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Biomechanical assessment of anterior lumbar interbody fusion with an anterior lumbosacral fixation screw-plate: comparison to stand-alone anterior lumbar interbody fusion and anterior lumbar interbody fusion with pedicle screws in an unstable human cadaver model. Gerber M, Crawford NR, Chamberlain RH, Fifield MS, LeHuec JC, Dickman CA. Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2006 Apr 01; 31(7):762-8. PubMed ID: 16582849 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Biomechanical comparison of cervical spine reconstructive techniques after a multilevel corpectomy of the cervical spine. Singh K, Vaccaro AR, Kim J, Lorenz EP, Lim TH, An HS. Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2003 Oct 15; 28(20):2352-8; discussion 2358. PubMed ID: 14560082 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Pedicle screws enhance primary stability in multilevel cervical corpectomies: biomechanical in vitro comparison of different implants including constrained and nonconstrained posterior instumentations. Schmidt R, Wilke HJ, Claes L, Puhl W, Richter M. Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2003 Aug 15; 28(16):1821-8. PubMed ID: 12923469 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. The biomechanical effect of transverse connectors use in a pre- and postlaminectomy model of the posterior cervical spine: an in vitro cadaveric study. Majid K, Gudipally M, Hussain M, Moldavsky M, Khalil S. Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2011 Dec 15; 36(26):E1694-701. PubMed ID: 21681141 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Biomechanical comparison of occiput-C1-C2 fixation techniques: C0-C1 transarticular screw and direct occiput condyle screw. Takigawa T, Simon P, Espinoza Orías AA, Hong JT, Ito Y, Inoue N, An HS. Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2012 May 20; 37(12):E696-701. PubMed ID: 22158063 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]