These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

324 related items for PubMed ID: 12784228

  • 1. Cost-effectiveness and test-performance factors in relation to universal newborn hearing screening.
    Gorga MP, Neely ST.
    Ment Retard Dev Disabil Res Rev; 2003; 9(2):103-8. PubMed ID: 12784228
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. Cost and cost-effectiveness of universal screening for hearing loss in newborns.
    Kezirian EJ, White KR, Yueh B, Sullivan SD.
    Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 2001 Apr; 124(4):359-67. PubMed ID: 11283492
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. Using benefit-cost ratio to select Universal Newborn Hearing Screening test criteria.
    Porter HL, Neely ST, Gorga MP.
    Ear Hear; 2009 Aug; 30(4):447-57. PubMed ID: 19455038
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. Universal Newborn Hearing Screening introduced to NICU infants in Canterbury Province, New Zealand.
    Flynn M, Austin N, Flynn TS, Ford R, Buckland L.
    N Z Med J; 2004 Nov 26; 117(1206):U1183. PubMed ID: 15570352
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. Projected cost-effectiveness of statewide universal newborn hearing screening.
    Keren R, Helfand M, Homer C, McPhillips H, Lieu TA.
    Pediatrics; 2002 Nov 26; 110(5):855-64. PubMed ID: 12415021
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. Newborn hearing screening programs: overview.
    Hyde ML.
    J Otolaryngol; 2005 Aug 26; 34 Suppl 2():S70-8. PubMed ID: 16076420
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. Costs and performance of early hearing detection programmes in Lagos, Nigeria.
    Olusanya BO, Emokpae A, Renner JK, Wirz SL.
    Trans R Soc Trop Med Hyg; 2009 Feb 26; 103(2):179-86. PubMed ID: 18814895
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. Comparison of hearing screening programs between one step with transient evoked otoacoustic emissions (TEOAE) and two steps with TEOAE and automated auditory brainstem response.
    Lin HC, Shu MT, Lee KS, Ho GM, Fu TY, Bruna S, Lin G.
    Laryngoscope; 2005 Nov 26; 115(11):1957-62. PubMed ID: 16319605
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. The universal newborn hearing screening program at the University Hospital of Ferrara: focus on costs and software solutions.
    Ciorba A, Hatzopoulos S, Busi M, Guerrini P, Petruccelli J, Martini A.
    Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol; 2008 Jun 26; 72(6):807-16. PubMed ID: 18395270
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. Economic evaluation of tandem mass spectrometry screening in California.
    Feuchtbaum L, Cunningham G.
    Pediatrics; 2006 May 26; 117(5 Pt 2):S280-6. PubMed ID: 16735254
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 17.