These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

162 related items for PubMed ID: 12799543

  • 1. Impact of digital labeling on outcome measures.
    Bentler RA, Niebuhr DP, Johnson TA, Flamme GA.
    Ear Hear; 2003 Jun; 24(3):215-24. PubMed ID: 12799543
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. Personality, hearing problems, and amplification characteristics: contributions to self-report hearing aid outcomes.
    Cox RM, Alexander GC, Gray GA.
    Ear Hear; 2007 Apr; 28(2):141-62. PubMed ID: 17496667
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. Acclimatization in first-time hearing aid users using three different fitting protocols.
    Reber MB, Kompis M.
    Auris Nasus Larynx; 2005 Dec; 32(4):345-51. PubMed ID: 16039083
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. Own voice qualities (OVQ) in hearing-aid users: there is more than just occlusion.
    Laugesen S, Jensen NS, Maas P, Nielsen C.
    Int J Audiol; 2011 Apr; 50(4):226-36. PubMed ID: 21275499
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. Speech perception for adults who use hearing aids in conjunction with cochlear implants in opposite ears.
    Mok M, Grayden D, Dowell RC, Lawrence D.
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2006 Apr; 49(2):338-51. PubMed ID: 16671848
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. Benefit of wearing a hearing aid on the unimplanted ear in adult users of a cochlear implant.
    Dunn CC, Tyler RS, Witt SA.
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2005 Jun; 48(3):668-80. PubMed ID: 16197280
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. Speech reception thresholds in noise and self-reported hearing disability in a general adult population.
    Smits C, Kramer SE, Houtgast T.
    Ear Hear; 2006 Oct; 27(5):538-49. PubMed ID: 16957503
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. Full time directional versus user selectable microphone modes in hearing aids.
    Ricketts T, Henry P, Gnewikow D.
    Ear Hear; 2003 Oct; 24(5):424-39. PubMed ID: 14534412
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. The Performance-Perceptual Test (PPT) and its relationship to aided reported handicap and hearing aid satisfaction.
    Saunders GH, Forsline A.
    Ear Hear; 2006 Jun; 27(3):229-42. PubMed ID: 16672792
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. Comparison of performance on the hearing in noise test using directional microphones and digital noise reduction algorithms.
    Nordrum S, Erler S, Garstecki D, Dhar S.
    Am J Audiol; 2006 Jun; 15(1):81-91. PubMed ID: 16803795
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. Effect of training on word-recognition performance in noise for young normal-hearing and older hearing-impaired listeners.
    Burk MH, Humes LE, Amos NE, Strauser LE.
    Ear Hear; 2006 Jun; 27(3):263-78. PubMed ID: 16672795
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. Clinical evaluation of higher stimulation rates in the nucleus research platform 8 system.
    Plant K, Holden L, Skinner M, Arcaroli J, Whitford L, Law MA, Nel E.
    Ear Hear; 2007 Jun; 28(3):381-93. PubMed ID: 17485987
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 9.