These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
Pubmed for Handhelds
PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS
Journal Abstract Search
312 related items for PubMed ID: 12800326
1. Cures on the cob. Roosevelt M. Time; 2003 May 26; 161(21):56-7. PubMed ID: 12800326 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. The science and politics of plant biotechnology--a personal perspective. Vasil IK. Nat Biotechnol; 2003 Aug 26; 21(8):849-51. PubMed ID: 12894193 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. GM crops: a continent divided. Masood E. Nature; 2003 Nov 20; 426(6964):224-6. PubMed ID: 14628018 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Consumer acceptance of biotechnology and the role of second generation technologies in the USA and Europe. Lusk JL, Rozan A. Trends Biotechnol; 2005 Aug 20; 23(8):386-7. PubMed ID: 15953650 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Safety assessment, detection and traceability, and societal aspects of genetically modified foods. European Network on Safety Assessment of Genetically Modified Food Crops (ENTRANSFOOD). Concluding remarks. Kuiper HA, König A, Kleter GA, Hammes WP, Knudsen I, European Network on Safety Assessment of Genetically Modified Food Crops (ENTRANSFOOD). Food Chem Toxicol; 2004 Jul 20; 42(7):1195-202. PubMed ID: 15123387 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Potential adverse health effects of genetically modified crops. Bakshi A. J Toxicol Environ Health B Crit Rev; 2003 Jul 20; 6(3):211-25. PubMed ID: 12746139 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. GM giants pair up to do battle. Mitchell P. Nat Biotechnol; 2007 Jul 20; 25(7):695-6. PubMed ID: 17621277 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Plant biotech bonanza. Waltz E. Nat Biotechnol; 2008 Oct 20; 26(10):1060. PubMed ID: 18846061 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Puzzling industry response to ProdiGene fiasco. Fox JL. Nat Biotechnol; 2003 Jan 20; 21(1):3-4. PubMed ID: 12511893 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. US calls for early data on transgenic crop safety. Check E. Nature; 2002 Aug 08; 418(6898):571. PubMed ID: 12167819 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. EU reflects European public opinion. Borch K, Lassen J, Jørgensen RB. Nat Biotechnol; 2003 Sep 08; 21(9):976. PubMed ID: 12949553 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. US food aid still under GM cloud. Jayaraman KS. Nat Biotechnol; 2003 Apr 08; 21(4):346-7. PubMed ID: 12665809 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. First salvo in transatlantic food fight is far from last word. Miller HI. Nat Biotechnol; 2003 Jul 08; 21(7):737-8. PubMed ID: 12833087 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Will we reap what biopharming sows? Miller HI. Nat Biotechnol; 2003 May 08; 21(5):480-1. PubMed ID: 12721561 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Action needed to harmonize regulation of low-level presence of biotech traits. Krueger R, Le Buanec B. Nat Biotechnol; 2008 Feb 08; 26(2):161-2. PubMed ID: 18259165 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. A baroque solution to a nonproblem. Miller HI, Huttner SL. Nat Biotechnol; 1998 Aug 08; 16(8):698-9. PubMed ID: 9702753 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. FDA on transgenic animals--a dog's breakfast? Miller HI. Nat Biotechnol; 2008 Feb 08; 26(2):159-60. PubMed ID: 18259164 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. [Supervision of genetically modified foods by the international community]. Wang R, Yang X. Wei Sheng Yan Jiu; 2007 Mar 08; 36(2):245-8. PubMed ID: 17555112 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] Page: [Next] [New Search]