These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
Pubmed for Handhelds
PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS
Journal Abstract Search
332 related items for PubMed ID: 12811312
1. Magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography versus endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography in the diagnosis of choledocholithiasis. Griffin N, Wastle ML, Dunn WK, Ryder SD, Beckingham IJ. Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol; 2003 Jul; 15(7):809-13. PubMed ID: 12811312 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Diagnostic accuracy of magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography and ultrasound compared with direct cholangiography in the detection of choledocholithiasis. Varghese JC, Liddell RP, Farrell MA, Murray FE, Osborne DH, Lee MJ. Clin Radiol; 2000 Jan; 55(1):25-35. PubMed ID: 10650107 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. The diagnostic accuracy of magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography and ultrasound compared with direct cholangiography in the detection of choledocholithiasis. Varghese JC, Liddell RP, Farrell MA, Murray FE, Osborne H, Lee MJ. Clin Radiol; 1999 Sep; 54(9):604-14. PubMed ID: 10505997 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Prospective assessment of magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography for noninvasive imaging of the biliary tree. Taylor AC, Little AF, Hennessy OF, Banting SW, Smith PJ, Desmond PV. Gastrointest Endosc; 2002 Jan; 55(1):17-22. PubMed ID: 11756908 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Magnetic resonance cholangio-pancreatography versus endoscopic retrograde cholangio-pancreatography in the diagnosis of common bile duct stones: a prospective comparative study. Scaffidi MG, Luigiano C, Consolo P, Pellicano R, Giacobbe G, Gaeta M, Blandino A, Familiari L. Minerva Med; 2009 Oct; 100(5):341-8. PubMed ID: 19910887 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. [Accuracy of magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography for the diagnosis of common bile duct stones]. Norero E, Norero B, Huete A, Pimentel F, Cruz F, Ibáñez L, Martínez J, Jarufe N. Rev Med Chil; 2008 May; 136(5):600-5. PubMed ID: 18769807 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Use of Magnetic Resonance Cholangiopancreatography in Clinical Practice: Not as Good as We Once Thought. Aydelotte JD, Ali J, Huynh PT, Coopwood TB, Uecker JM, Brown CV. J Am Coll Surg; 2015 Jul; 221(1):215-9. PubMed ID: 26047762 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Clinical significance of magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography (MRCP) compared to endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP). Hintze RE, Adler A, Veltzke W, Abou-Rebyeh H, Hammerstingl R, Vogl T, Felix R. Endoscopy; 1997 Mar; 29(3):182-7. PubMed ID: 9201467 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Diagnostic accuracy of MRCP in choledocholithiasis. Guarise A, Baltieri S, Mainardi P, Faccioli N. Radiol Med; 2005 Mar; 109(3):239-51. PubMed ID: 15775893 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. The Role of Magnetic Resonance Cholangiopancreatography in the Diagnosis of Choledocholithiasis: Do Benefits Outweigh the Costs? Ward WH, Fluke LM, Hoagland BD, Zarow GJ, Held JM, Ricca RL. Am Surg; 2015 Jul; 81(7):720-5. PubMed ID: 26140894 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography accurately predicts the presence or absence of choledocholithiasis. Hochwald SN, Dobryansky M BA, Rofsky NM, Naik KS, Shamamian P, Coppa G, Marcus SG. J Gastrointest Surg; 1998 Jul; 2(6):573-9. PubMed ID: 10457316 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. MR cholangiopancreatography: prospective comparison of 3-dimensional turbo spin echo and single-shot turbo spin echo with ERCP. Chen RC, Lin KY, Lii JM, Yang MT, Chen WT, Tu HY, Wang CS. J Formos Med Assoc; 2003 Mar; 102(3):172-7. PubMed ID: 12783134 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Preoperative routine magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography before laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a prospective study. Jendresen MB, Thorbøll JE, Adamsen S, Nielsen H, Grønvall S, Hart-Hansen O. Eur J Surg; 2002 Mar; 168(12):690-4. PubMed ID: 15362577 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. The detection of bile duct stones in suspected biliary pancreatitis: comparison of MRCP, ERCP, and intraductal US. Moon JH, Cho YD, Cha SW, Cheon YK, Ahn HC, Kim YS, Kim YS, Lee JS, Lee MS, Lee HK, Shim CS, Kim BS. Am J Gastroenterol; 2005 May; 100(5):1051-7. PubMed ID: 15842578 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Can endoscopic ultrasound or magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography replace ERCP in patients with suspected biliary disease? A prospective trial and cost analysis. Scheiman JM, Carlos RC, Barnett JL, Elta GH, Nostrant TT, Chey WD, Francis IR, Nandi PS. Am J Gastroenterol; 2001 Oct; 96(10):2900-4. PubMed ID: 11693324 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Diagnostic value of magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography to detect bile duct stones in acute biliary pancreatitis. Lee SL, Kim HK, Choi HH, Jeon BS, Kim TH, Choi JM, Ku YM, Kim SW, Kim SS, Chae HS. Pancreatology; 2018 Jan; 18(1):22-28. PubMed ID: 29246689 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Role of magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography in patients with suspected choledocholithiasis. Calvo MM, Bujanda L, Calderón A, Heras I, Cabriada JL, Bernal A, Orive V, Capelastegi A. Mayo Clin Proc; 2002 May; 77(5):422-8. PubMed ID: 12004991 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Magnetic resonance-cholangiopancreatography in the diagnosis of biliopancreatic diseases. Lomanto D, Pavone P, Laghi A, Panebianco V, Mazzocchi P, Fiocca F, Lezoche E, Passariello R, Speranza V. Am J Surg; 1997 Jul; 174(1):33-8. PubMed ID: 9240949 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] Page: [Next] [New Search]