These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

309 related items for PubMed ID: 12818852

  • 1. Comparing image quality of flat-panel chest radiography with storage phosphor radiography and film-screen radiography.
    Ganten M, Radeleff B, Kampschulte A, Daniels MD, Kauffmann GW, Hansmann J.
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2003 Jul; 181(1):171-6. PubMed ID: 12818852
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. Dose reduction in patients undergoing chest imaging: digital amorphous silicon flat-panel detector radiography versus conventional film-screen radiography and phosphor-based computed radiography.
    Bacher K, Smeets P, Bonnarens K, De Hauwere A, Verstraete K, Thierens H.
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2003 Oct; 181(4):923-9. PubMed ID: 14500203
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. Lumbar spine radiography: digital flat-panel detector versus screen-film and storage-phosphor systems in monkeys as a pediatric model.
    Ludwig K, Ahlers K, Wormanns D, Freund M, Bernhardt TM, Diederich S, Heindel W.
    Radiology; 2003 Oct; 229(1):140-4. PubMed ID: 12925714
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. Performance of a flat-panel detector in detecting artificial bone lesions: comparison with conventional screen-film and storage-phosphor radiography.
    Ludwig K, Lenzen H, Kamm KF, Link TM, Diederich S, Wormanns D, Heindel W.
    Radiology; 2002 Feb; 222(2):453-9. PubMed ID: 11818613
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. Digital radiography versus conventional radiography in chest imaging: diagnostic performance of a large-area silicon flat-panel detector in a clinical CT-controlled study.
    Garmer M, Hennigs SP, Jäger HJ, Schrick F, van de Loo T, Jacobs A, Hanusch A, Christmann A, Mathias K.
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2000 Jan; 174(1):75-80. PubMed ID: 10628458
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. [Digital radiography: from storage phosphor plates to direct detector systems].
    Schaefer-Prokop C, Uffmann M, Stadler A.
    Wien Med Wochenschr Suppl; 2002 Jan; (113):30-4. PubMed ID: 12621834
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. Performance of a flat-panel detector in the detection of artificial erosive changes: comparison with conventional screen-film and storage-phosphor radiography.
    Ludwig K, Henschel A, Bernhardt TM, Lenzen H, Wormanns D, Diederich S, Heindel W.
    Eur Radiol; 2003 Jun; 13(6):1316-23. PubMed ID: 12764648
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. Radiation dose reduction in chest radiography using a flat-panel amorphous silicon detector.
    Hosch WP, Fink C, Radeleff B, kampschulte a A, Kauffmann GW, Hansmann J.
    Clin Radiol; 2002 Oct; 57(10):902-7. PubMed ID: 12413914
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. Flat-panel x-ray detector based on amorphous silicon versus asymmetric screen-film system: phantom study of dose reduction and depiction of simulated findings.
    Rapp-Bernhardt U, Roehl FW, Gibbs RC, Schmidl H, Krause UW, Bernhardt TM.
    Radiology; 2003 May; 227(2):484-92. PubMed ID: 12676965
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. Quality of digital pre-implant tomography: comparison of film-screen images with storage phosphor images at normal and low dose.
    Ekestubbe A, Gröndahl HG, Molander B.
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2003 Sep; 32(5):322-6. PubMed ID: 14709608
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. [Image quality and exposure dose in digital projection radiography].
    Busch HP, Busch S, Decker C, Schilz C.
    Rofo; 2003 Jan; 175(1):32-7. PubMed ID: 12525978
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. Chest radiography with a flat-panel detector: image quality with dose reduction after copper filtration.
    Hamer OW, Sirlin CB, Strotzer M, Borisch I, Zorger N, Feuerbach S, Völk M.
    Radiology; 2005 Nov; 237(2):691-700. PubMed ID: 16192324
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. Routine chest radiography using a flat-panel detector: image quality at standard detector dose and 33% dose reduction.
    Strotzer M, Völk M, Fründ R, Hamer O, Zorger N, Feuerbach S.
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2002 Jan; 178(1):169-71. PubMed ID: 11756114
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 16.