These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search


287 related items for PubMed ID: 12828915

  • 1.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. Biomechanical comparison of newly designed stemless prosthesis and conventional hip prosthesis--an experimental study.
    Tai CL, Lee MS, Chen WP, Hsieh PH, Lee PC, Shih CH.
    Biomed Mater Eng; 2005; 15(3):239-49. PubMed ID: 15912004
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. Finite element analysis of cementless femoral stems based on mid- and long-term radiological evaluation.
    Matsuyama K, Ishidou Y, Guo YM, Kakoi H, Setoguchi T, Nagano S, Kawamura I, Maeda S, Komiya S.
    BMC Musculoskelet Disord; 2016 Sep 19; 17(1):397. PubMed ID: 27642748
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. The effect of femoral stem geometry on interface motion in uncemented porous-coated total hip prostheses. Comparison of straight-stem and curved-stem designs.
    Callaghan JJ, Fulghum CS, Glisson RR, Stranne SK.
    J Bone Joint Surg Am; 1992 Jul 19; 74(6):839-48. PubMed ID: 1634574
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. Quantification of implant micromotion, strain shielding, and bone resorption with porous-coated anatomic medullary locking femoral prostheses.
    Engh CA, O'Connor D, Jasty M, McGovern TF, Bobyn JD, Harris WH.
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 1992 Dec 19; (285):13-29. PubMed ID: 1446429
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. Numerical evaluation of bone remodelling and adaptation considering different hip prosthesis designs.
    Levadnyi I, Awrejcewicz J, Gubaua JE, Pereira JT.
    Clin Biomech (Bristol); 2017 Dec 19; 50():122-129. PubMed ID: 29100185
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. Acetabular Bone Defect in Total Hip Arthroplasty for Crowe II or III Developmental Dysplasia of the Hip: A Finite Element Study.
    Du Y, Fu J, Sun J, Zhang G, Chen J, Ni M, Zhou Y.
    Biomed Res Int; 2020 Dec 19; 2020():4809013. PubMed ID: 32908892
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. Selection of fixation devices in proximal femur rotational osteotomy: clinical complications and finite element analysis.
    Chen WP, Tai CL, Shih CH, Hsieh PH, Leou MC, Lee MS.
    Clin Biomech (Bristol); 2004 Mar 19; 19(3):255-62. PubMed ID: 15003340
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]


    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 15.