These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

718 related items for PubMed ID: 12847648

  • 21. Magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography.
    Mesrur Halefoglu A.
    Semin Roentgenol; 2008 Oct; 43(4):282-9. PubMed ID: 18774032
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 22. Half-Fourier RARE MR cholangiopancreatography: experience in 300 subjects.
    Fulcher AS, Turner MA, Capps GW, Zfass AM, Baker KM.
    Radiology; 1998 Apr; 207(1):21-32. PubMed ID: 9530295
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 23. Evaluation of the pancreas: a comparison of single thick-slice MR cholangiopancreatography with multiple thin-slice volume reconstruction MR cholangiopancreatography.
    Masui T, Takehara Y, Ichijo K, Naito M, Watahiki H, Kaneko M, Nozaki A, Sun Y.
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1999 Dec; 173(6):1519-26. PubMed ID: 10584795
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 24. A comparative study of magnetic resonance cholangiography and direct cholangiography.
    Alcaraz MJ, De la Morena EJ, Polo A, Ramos A, De la Cal MA, González Mandly A.
    Rev Esp Enferm Dig; 2000 Jul; 92(7):427-38. PubMed ID: 11026760
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 25. Non-invasive evaluation of the biliary tree with magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography: initial clinical experience.
    Pavone P, Laghi A, Catalano C, Broglia L, Fiocca F, Passariello R.
    Ital J Gastroenterol; 1996 Jul; 28(2):63-9. PubMed ID: 8781996
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 26. Image quality and bile duct volumetry in MR cholangiopancreatography augmented with low-dose morphine.
    Kröpil P, Erhardt A, Mehnert S, Beck A, Häussinger D, Mödder U, Blondin D.
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2010 Feb; 194(2):W171-5. PubMed ID: 20093569
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 27. [Demonstration of normal bile duct and pancreatic duct with MR cholangiopancreatography].
    Toda J, Ueno E, Takada Y, Okawa T.
    Nihon Rinsho; 1998 Nov; 56(11):2830-5. PubMed ID: 9847605
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 28. Extrahepatic biliary obstruction: magnetic resonance imaging compared with endoscopic ultrasonography.
    Materne R, Van Beers BE, Gigot JF, Jamart J, Geubel A, Pringot J, Deprez P.
    Endoscopy; 2000 Jan; 32(1):3-9. PubMed ID: 10691265
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 29. [Evaluation of a new MRI cholangiography sequence with a half-Fourier acquisition technic].
    Aubé C, Godoy JM, Vuillemin E, Burtin P, Boyer J, Caron C.
    J Radiol; 1998 Dec; 79(12):1487-92. PubMed ID: 9921451
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 30. 2D thick-slab MR cholangiopancreatography: does parallel imaging with sensitivity encoding improve image quality and duct visualization?
    Hosseinzadeh K, Furlan A, Almusa O.
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2008 Jun; 190(6):W327-34. PubMed ID: 18492874
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 31. MR cholangiopancreatography: comparison of images obtained with 1.0 and 1.5 Tesla units.
    Yasui M, Ito K, Koike S, Matsunaga N.
    Radiat Med; 2002 Jun; 20(2):77-82. PubMed ID: 12041702
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 32. Magnetic resonance pancreatography.
    Barish M, Soto J, Ferrucci J.
    Endoscopy; 1997 Aug; 29(6):487-95. PubMed ID: 9342566
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 33. Magnetic resonance study of the pancreatic duct.
    Calvo MM, Calderón A, Heras I, Durán M, Orive V, Cabriada J, Astigarraga E.
    Rev Esp Enferm Dig; 1999 Apr; 91(4):287-96. PubMed ID: 10348928
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 34. Gadoxate-enhanced T 1-weighted MR cholangiography: comparison of 1.5 T and 3.0 T.
    Koelblinger C, Schima W, Weber M, Mang T, Nemec S, Kulinna-Cosentini C, Bastati N, Ba-Ssalamah A.
    Rofo; 2009 Jun; 181(6):587-92. PubMed ID: 19353488
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 35. Right-lobe living related liver transplantation: evaluation of a comprehensive magnetic resonance imaging protocol for assessing potential donors.
    Goyen M, Barkhausen J, Debatin JF, Kühl H, Bosk S, Testa G, Malago M, Ruehm SG.
    Liver Transpl; 2002 Mar; 8(3):241-50. PubMed ID: 11910569
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 36. MR cholangiopancreatography: comparison of 2D single-shot fast spin-echo and 3D fast spin-echo sequences.
    Cova M, Stacul F, Cester G, Ukmar M, Pozzi Mucelli R.
    Radiol Med; 2003 Sep; 106(3):178-90. PubMed ID: 14612839
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 37. Single-shot MR cholangiopancreatography of neonates, infants, and young children.
    Miyazaki T, Yamashita Y, Tang Y, Tsuchigame T, Takahashi M, Sera Y.
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1998 Jan; 170(1):33-7. PubMed ID: 9423593
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 38. Free breathing magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography (MRCP) at end expiration: a new technique to expand clinical application.
    Chen JH, Chai JW, Chu WC, Chang JM, Shen WC, Lee SK.
    Hepatogastroenterology; 2002 Jan; 49(45):593-6. PubMed ID: 12063947
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 39. Comparison of three-dimensional negative-contrast CT cholangiopancreatography with three-dimensional MR cholangiopancreatography for the diagnosis of obstructive biliary diseases.
    Zhang ZY, Wang D, Ni JM, Yu XR, Zhang L, Wu WJ, Gong L, Hu MH.
    Eur J Radiol; 2012 May; 81(5):830-7. PubMed ID: 21377820
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 40. [MR cholangiopancreatography using an open low field system of 0.2 tesla: early clinical results compared with a high field system (1.5 tesla) and ERCP].
    Wacker F, Branding G, Zimmer T, Faiss S, Wolf KJ.
    Rofo; 1997 Dec; 167(6):579-84. PubMed ID: 9465952
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Previous] [Next] [New Search]
    of 36.