These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

153 related items for PubMed ID: 1286721

  • 1. Deterioration in the accuracy of the pulsair non-contact tonometer with use: need for regular calibration.
    Atkinson PL, Wishart PK, James JN, Vernon SA, Reid F.
    Eye (Lond); 1992; 6 ( Pt 5)():530-4. PubMed ID: 1286721
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. Comparison of a new non-contact tonometer with Goldmann applanation.
    Moseley MJ, Evans NM, Fielder AR.
    Eye (Lond); 1989; 3 ( Pt 3)():332-7. PubMed ID: 2612679
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. Comparison of the Keeler Pulsair 2000 non-contact tonometer with Goldmann applanation.
    Moseley MJ, Thompson JR, Deutsch J, Misson GP, Naylor G, Tan-Yee A, Taylor RH, Fielder AR.
    Eye (Lond); 1993; 7 ( Pt 1)():127-30. PubMed ID: 8325401
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. Clinical evaluation of the Keeler Pulsair 3000 non-contact tonometer.
    Lawson-Kopp W, DeJong A, Yudcovitch L, Williams S, Kohl P, Yolton RL.
    Optometry; 2002 Feb; 73(2):81-90. PubMed ID: 12365714
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. Clinical comparison of the Keeler Pulsair 2000, American Optical MkII and Goldmann applanation tonometers.
    Mackie SW, Jay JL, Ackerley R, Walsh G.
    Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 1996 Mar; 16(2):171-7. PubMed ID: 8762780
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. [Reproducibility of the results of two non-contact tonometers. Comparison with the Goldmann applanation tonometer].
    Gräf M, Hoffmann OF.
    Klin Monbl Augenheilkd; 1992 Jun; 200(6):678-82. PubMed ID: 1507794
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. Accuracy and reliability of the Keeler Pulsair EasyEye non-contact tonometer.
    Ogbuehi KC, Almubrad TM.
    Optom Vis Sci; 2008 Jan; 85(1):61-6. PubMed ID: 18174841
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. Evaluation of the Keeler Pulsair non-contact tonometer.
    Sponsel WE, Kaufman PL, Strinden TI, DePaul KL, Bowes HN, Olander KW, Barnebey HS.
    Acta Ophthalmol (Copenh); 1989 Oct; 67(5):567-72. PubMed ID: 2589057
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. Microprocessor controlled tonometry.
    Draeger J, Rumberger E, Dauper J, Deutsch C.
    Eye (Lond); 1989 Oct; 3 ( Pt 6)():738-42. PubMed ID: 2630355
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. A comparative study of intraocular pressure measurement by three tonometers in normal subjects.
    Prabhakar SK, Mahesh BS, Shanthamallappa M.
    Nepal J Ophthalmol; 2013 Oct; 5(2):201-6. PubMed ID: 24172555
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. Clinical evaluation of five portable tonometers.
    Wingert TA, Bassi CJ, McAlister WH, Galanis JC.
    J Am Optom Assoc; 1995 Nov; 66(11):670-4. PubMed ID: 8576531
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. Clinical evaluation of the Keeler PULSAIR 2000 tonometer.
    Pearce CD, Kohl P, Yolton RL.
    J Am Optom Assoc; 1992 Feb; 63(2):106-10. PubMed ID: 1583262
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. [Comparison of tonometry with the Keeler air puff non-contact tonometer "Pulsair" and the Goldmann applanation tonometer].
    Yücel AA, Stürmer J, Gloor B.
    Klin Monbl Augenheilkd; 1990 Oct; 197(4):329-34. PubMed ID: 2280569
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. On repeated corneal applanation with the Goldmann and two non-contact tonometers.
    Almubrad TM, Ogbuehi KC.
    Clin Exp Optom; 2010 Mar; 93(2):77-82. PubMed ID: 20406256
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. Evaluation of the Tono-Pen and the Pulsair tonometers.
    Armstrong TA.
    Am J Ophthalmol; 1990 Jun 15; 109(6):716-20. PubMed ID: 2346202
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. [Comparative studies of the calibration of new electronic automatic tonometers].
    Wirt H, Draeger J, Rumberger E, Deutsch C, Dauper J.
    Fortschr Ophthalmol; 1989 Jun 15; 86(4):403-6. PubMed ID: 2793017
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. Clinical comparison of air-puff and Goldmann tonometers.
    Brencher HL, Kohl P, Reinke AR, Yolton RL.
    J Am Optom Assoc; 1991 May 15; 62(5):395-402. PubMed ID: 1822985
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. Comparison of the Pulsair noncontact tonometer and the Goldmann applanation tonometer.
    Climenhaga H, Plucinska H.
    Can J Ophthalmol; 1989 Feb 15; 24(1):7-9. PubMed ID: 2713754
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. Measurement of Goldmann applanation tonometer calibration error.
    Choudhari NS, George R, Baskaran M, Vijaya L, Dudeja N.
    Ophthalmology; 2009 Jan 15; 116(1):3-8. PubMed ID: 18708256
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. Comparison of the IOPen and iCare rebound tonometers with the Goldmann tonometer in a normal population.
    Jorge J, Fernandes P, Queirós A, Ribeiro P, Garcês C, Gonzalez-Meijome JM.
    Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 2010 Jan 15; 30(1):108-12. PubMed ID: 20444114
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 8.