These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

293 related items for PubMed ID: 12908762

  • 1.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. Concurrent schedules: short- and long-term effects of reinforcers.
    Landon J, Davison M, Elliffe D.
    J Exp Anal Behav; 2002 May; 77(3):257-71. PubMed ID: 12083679
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. Choosing among multiple alternatives: Relative and overall reinforcer rates.
    Beeby E, Alsop B.
    J Exp Anal Behav; 2017 Sep; 108(2):204-222. PubMed ID: 28758210
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. Relative reinforcer rates and magnitudes do not control concurrent choice independently.
    Elliffe D, Davison M, Landon J.
    J Exp Anal Behav; 2008 Sep; 90(2):169-85. PubMed ID: 18831124
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. Concurrent-schedule performance in transition: changeover delays and signaled reinforcer ratios.
    Krägeloh CU, Davison M.
    J Exp Anal Behav; 2003 Jan; 79(1):87-109. PubMed ID: 12696743
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. Preference and resistance to change with constant-duration schedule components.
    Nevin JA, Grace RC.
    J Exp Anal Behav; 2000 Jul; 74(1):79-100. PubMed ID: 10966097
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. Choice in a variable environment: every reinforcer counts.
    Davison M, Baum WM.
    J Exp Anal Behav; 2000 Jul; 74(1):1-24. PubMed ID: 10966094
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. The effects of changeover delays on local choice.
    Gomes-Ng S, Landon J, Elliffe D, Bensemann J, Cowie S.
    Behav Processes; 2018 May; 150():36-46. PubMed ID: 29499344
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. Preference pulses without reinforcers.
    McLean AP, Grace RC, Pitts RC, Hughes CE.
    J Exp Anal Behav; 2014 May; 101(3):317-36. PubMed ID: 24676669
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. Rapid acquisition of preference in concurrent schedules: effects of reinforcement amount.
    Maguire DR, Hughes CE, Pitts RC.
    Behav Processes; 2007 Jun; 75(2):213-9. PubMed ID: 17416469
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. Fix and sample with rats in the dynamics of choice.
    Aparicio CF, Baum WM.
    J Exp Anal Behav; 2006 Jul; 86(1):43-63. PubMed ID: 16903492
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. Four-alternative choice violates the constant-ratio rule.
    Elliffe D, Davison M.
    Behav Processes; 2010 May; 84(1):381-9. PubMed ID: 19941942
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 15.