These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

108 related items for PubMed ID: 12909654

  • 1. Assessment of Chlamydia trachomatis infection of semen specimens by ligase chain reaction.
    Pannekoek Y, Westenberg SM, Eijk PP, Repping S, van der Veen F, van der Ende A, Dankert J.
    J Med Microbiol; 2003 Sep; 52(Pt 9):777-779. PubMed ID: 12909654
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. Accuracy of results obtained by performing a second ligase chain reaction assay and PCR analysis on urine samples with positive or near-cutoff results in the LCx test for Chlamydia trachomatis.
    Castriciano S, Luinstra K, Jang D, Patel J, Mahony J, Kapala J, Chernesky M.
    J Clin Microbiol; 2002 Jul; 40(7):2632-4. PubMed ID: 12089293
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. Detection of Chlamydia trachomatis in semen of artificial insemination donors by the polymerase chain reaction.
    van den Brule AJ, Hemrika DJ, Walboomers JM, Raaphorst P, van Amstel N, Bleker OP, Meijer CJ.
    Fertil Steril; 1993 May; 59(5):1098-104. PubMed ID: 8486181
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. Assessment of Chlamydia trachomatis infection in asymptomatic male partners of infertile couples.
    Hamdad-Daoudi F, Petit J, Eb F.
    J Med Microbiol; 2004 Oct; 53(Pt 10):985-990. PubMed ID: 15358820
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. PCR assessment of Chlamydia trachomatis infection of semen specimens processed for artificial insemination.
    Pannekoek Y, Westenberg SM, de Vries J, Repping S, Spanjaard L, Eijk PP, van der Ende A, Dankert J.
    J Clin Microbiol; 2000 Oct; 38(10):3763-7. PubMed ID: 11015399
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. Chlamydia trachomatis detected by ligase chain reaction in the semen of asymptomatic patients without pyospermia or pyuria.
    Fujisawa M, Nakano Y, Matsui T, Okada H, Arakawa S, Kamidono S.
    Arch Androl; 1999 Oct; 42(1):41-4. PubMed ID: 9973144
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. Comparison between the LCx Probe system and the COBAS AMPLICOR system for detection of Chlamydia trachomatis and Neisseria gonorrhoeae infections in patients attending a clinic for treatment of sexually transmitted diseases in Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
    van Doornum GJ, Schouls LM, Pijl A, Cairo I, Buimer M, Bruisten S.
    J Clin Microbiol; 2001 Mar; 39(3):829-35. PubMed ID: 11230391
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. Assessment of Chlamydia trachomatis, Ureaplasma urealyticum, Ureaplasma parvum, Mycoplasma hominis, and Mycoplasma genitalium in semen and first void urine specimens of asymptomatic male partners of infertile couples.
    Gdoura R, Kchaou W, Ammar-Keskes L, Chakroun N, Sellemi A, Znazen A, Rebai T, Hammami A.
    J Androl; 2008 Mar; 29(2):198-206. PubMed ID: 18077823
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. Comparison of manual Amplicor PCR, Cobas Amplicor PCR, and LCx assays for detection of Chlamydia trachomatis infection in women by using urine specimens.
    Pasternack R, Vuorinen P, Pitkäjärvi T, Koskela M, Miettinen A.
    J Clin Microbiol; 1997 Feb; 35(2):402-5. PubMed ID: 9003605
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. External quality assessment program for Chlamydia trachomatis diagnostic testing by nucleic acid amplification assays.
    Land S, Tabrizi S, Gust A, Johnson E, Garland S, Dax EM.
    J Clin Microbiol; 2002 Aug; 40(8):2893-6. PubMed ID: 12149347
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. Comparison of the urine-based ligase chain reaction test to culture for detection of Chlamydia trachomatis and Neisseria gonorrhoeae in pediatric sexual abuse victims.
    Girardet RG, McClain N, Lahoti S, Cheung K, Hartwell B, McNeese M.
    Pediatr Infect Dis J; 2001 Feb; 20(2):144-7. PubMed ID: 11224831
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. Detection of Chlamydia trachomatis in semen by the polymerase chain reaction in male members of infertile couples.
    Witkin SS, Jeremias J, Grifo JA, Ledger WJ.
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 1993 May; 168(5):1457-62. PubMed ID: 8498427
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. Optimised sample DNA preparation for detection of Chlamydia trachomatis in synovial tissue by polymerase chain reaction and ligase chain reaction.
    Freise J, Gérard HC, Bunke T, Whittum-Hudson JA, Zeidler H, Köhler L, Hudson AP, Kuipers JG.
    Ann Rheum Dis; 2001 Feb; 60(2):140-5. PubMed ID: 11156547
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. Comparison of first void urine and urogenital swab specimens for detection of Mycoplasma genitalium and Chlamydia trachomatis by polymerase chain reaction in patients attending a sexually transmitted disease clinic.
    Jensen JS, Björnelius E, Dohn B, Lidbrink P.
    Sex Transm Dis; 2004 Aug; 31(8):499-507. PubMed ID: 15273584
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. Real-time polymerase chain reaction shows that density centrifugation does not always remove Chlamydia trachomatis from human semen.
    Al-Mously N, Cross NA, Eley A, Pacey AA.
    Fertil Steril; 2009 Nov; 92(5):1606-15. PubMed ID: 18990376
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 6.