These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

236 related items for PubMed ID: 12927072

  • 1. Pedigree and marker information requirements to monitor genetic variability.
    Baumung R, Sölkner J.
    Genet Sel Evol; 2003; 35(4):369-83. PubMed ID: 12927072
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. A mating advice system in dairy cattle incorporating genomic information.
    Carthy TR, McCarthy J, Berry DP.
    J Dairy Sci; 2019 Sep; 102(9):8210-8220. PubMed ID: 31229287
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. Marker-assisted selection can reduce true as well as pedigree-estimated inbreeding.
    Pedersen LD, Sørensen AC, Berg P.
    J Dairy Sci; 2009 May; 92(5):2214-23. PubMed ID: 19389980
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. Measuring individual inbreeding in the age of genomics: marker-based measures are better than pedigrees.
    Kardos M, Luikart G, Allendorf FW.
    Heredity (Edinb); 2015 Jul; 115(1):63-72. PubMed ID: 26059970
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. Moderate multiple parentage and low genetic variation reduces the potential for genetic incompatibility avoidance despite high risk of inbreeding.
    Tuni C, Goodacre S, Bechsgaard J, Bilde T.
    PLoS One; 2012 Jul; 7(1):e29636. PubMed ID: 22235316
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. Estimation of microsatellite-based autozygosity and its correlation with pedigree inbreeding coefficient in crossbred cattle.
    Elavarasan K, Kumar S, Agarwal S, Vani A, Sharma R, Kumar S, Chauhan A, Sahoo NR, Verma MR, Gaur GK.
    Anim Biotechnol; 2023 Dec; 34(8):3564-3577. PubMed ID: 36811467
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. Estimating relatedness and inbreeding using molecular markers and pedigrees: the effect of demographic history.
    Robinson SP, Simmons LW, Kennington WJ.
    Mol Ecol; 2013 Dec; 22(23):5779-92. PubMed ID: 24102888
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. Estimation of inbreeding using pedigree, 50k SNP chip genotypes and full sequence data in three cattle breeds.
    Zhang Q, Calus MP, Guldbrandtsen B, Lund MS, Sahana G.
    BMC Genet; 2015 Jul 22; 16():88. PubMed ID: 26195126
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. Sib mating designs for mapping quantitative trait loci.
    Xie C, Gessler DD, Xu S.
    Genetica; 1998 Jul 22; 104(1):9-19. PubMed ID: 9949698
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. Pedigree relationships to control inbreeding in optimum-contribution selection realise more genetic gain than genomic relationships.
    Henryon M, Liu H, Berg P, Su G, Nielsen HM, Gebregiwergis GT, Sørensen AC.
    Genet Sel Evol; 2019 Jul 08; 51(1):39. PubMed ID: 31286868
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. Pedigrees or markers: Which are better in estimating relatedness and inbreeding coefficient?
    Wang J.
    Theor Popul Biol; 2016 Feb 08; 107():4-13. PubMed ID: 26344786
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. Allele frequencies of microsatellite loci for genetic characterization of a Sicilian bovine population.
    Cosenza M, Reale S, Lupo T, Vitale F, Caracappa S.
    Genet Mol Res; 2015 Jan 30; 14(1):691-9. PubMed ID: 25730006
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. How Well Do Molecular and Pedigree Relatedness Correspond, in Populations with Diverse Mating Systems, and Various Types and Quantities of Molecular and Demographic Data?
    Kopps AM, Kang J, Sherwin WB, Palsbøll PJ.
    G3 (Bethesda); 2015 Jun 30; 5(9):1815-26. PubMed ID: 26134496
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. Minimizing inbreeding by managing genetic contributions across generations.
    Sánchez L, Bijma P, Woolliams JA.
    Genetics; 2003 Aug 30; 164(4):1589-95. PubMed ID: 12930762
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. Optimised parent selection and minimum inbreeding mating in small aquaculture breeding schemes: a simulation study.
    Hely FS, Amer PR, Walker SP, Symonds JE.
    Animal; 2013 Jan 30; 7(1):1-10. PubMed ID: 23031385
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. Epistatic kinship a new measure of genetic diversity for short-term phylogenetic structures--theoretical investigations.
    Flury C, Tietze M, Simianer H.
    J Anim Breed Genet; 2006 Jun 30; 123(3):159-71. PubMed ID: 16706920
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. Meiotic recombination shapes precision of pedigree- and marker-based estimates of inbreeding.
    Knief U, Kempenaers B, Forstmeier W.
    Heredity (Edinb); 2017 Mar 30; 118(3):239-248. PubMed ID: 27804967
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. Molecular and pedigree analysis applied to conservation of animal genetic resources: the case of Brazilian Somali hair sheep.
    Paiva SR, Facó O, Faria DA, Lacerda T, Barretto GB, Carneiro PL, Lobo RN, McManus C.
    Trop Anim Health Prod; 2011 Oct 30; 43(7):1449-57. PubMed ID: 21533896
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. Maximum avoidance of inbreeding in haplodiploid populations.
    Nomura T.
    Math Biosci; 2018 Dec 30; 306():49-55. PubMed ID: 30339912
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. Effect of excluding sib matings on inbreeding coefficient and effective size of finite diploid populations.
    Wang J.
    Biometrics; 1997 Dec 30; 53(4):1354-65. PubMed ID: 9423254
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 12.