These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

246 related items for PubMed ID: 12928690

  • 1.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. Improving on ETDRS acuities: design and results for a computerised thresholding device.
    Rosser DA, Murdoch IE, Fitzke FW, Laidlaw DA.
    Eye (Lond); 2003 Aug; 17(6):701-6. PubMed ID: 12928680
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. Validation of a computerised logMAR visual acuity measurement system (COMPlog): comparison with ETDRS and the electronic ETDRS testing algorithm in adults and amblyopic children.
    Laidlaw DA, Tailor V, Shah N, Atamian S, Harcourt C.
    Br J Ophthalmol; 2008 Feb; 92(2):241-4. PubMed ID: 17993577
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. A customised portable LogMAR chart with adjustable chart illumination for use as a mass screening device in the rural population.
    Gouthaman M, Raman RP, Kadambi A, Padmajakumari R, Paul PG, Sharma T.
    J Postgrad Med; 2005 Feb; 51(2):112-4, discussion 115. PubMed ID: 16006702
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. [Repeatability and reliability of the visual acuity examination on logMAR ETDRS and Snellen chart].
    Veselý P, Synek S.
    Cesk Slov Oftalmol; 2012 May; 68(2):71-5. PubMed ID: 22913870
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. Effect of letter separation on computerised visual acuity measurements: comparison with the gold standard Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS) chart.
    Shah N, Laidlaw DA, Brown G, Robson C.
    Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 2010 Mar; 30(2):200-3. PubMed ID: 20444125
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. The Thai logarithmic visual acuity chart.
    Ruamviboonsuk P, Tiensuwan M.
    J Med Assoc Thai; 2002 Jun; 85(6):673-81. PubMed ID: 12322840
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. The development of a "reduced logMAR" visual acuity chart for use in routine clinical practice.
    Rosser DA, Laidlaw DA, Murdoch IE.
    Br J Ophthalmol; 2001 Apr; 85(4):432-6. PubMed ID: 11264133
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. Performance of a computerised visual acuity measurement device in subjects with age-related macular degeneration: comparison with gold standard ETDRS chart measurements.
    Bokinni Y, Shah N, Maguire O, Laidlaw DA.
    Eye (Lond); 2015 Aug; 29(8):1085-91. PubMed ID: 26043703
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. Comparing LEA numbers low vision book and Feinbloom visual acuity charts.
    Hardgrave N, Hatley J, Lewerenz D.
    Optom Vis Sci; 2012 Nov; 89(11):1611-8. PubMed ID: 23026789
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. Comparison of near visual acuity and reading metrics in presbyopia correction.
    Gupta N, Wolffsohn JS, Naroo SA.
    J Cataract Refract Surg; 2009 Aug; 35(8):1401-9. PubMed ID: 19631128
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 13.