These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
6. DDDR pacing results in left ventricular asynchrony with preservation of ejection fraction and NT-proBNP: a prospective study in sick sinus syndrome and normal ventricular function. Psychari SN, Apostolou TS, Iliodromitis EK, Charalampopoulos A, Kremastinos DT. Int J Cardiol; 2010 Oct 08; 144(2):310-2. PubMed ID: 19342110 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. A comparison of AAIR versus DDDR pacing for patients with sinus node dysfunction: a long-term follow-up study. Mutagaywa RK, Tumaini B, Chin A. Cardiovasc J Afr; 2010 Oct 08; 32(1):17-20. PubMed ID: 32946543 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Rate adaptive pacing in sick sinus syndrome: effects of pacing modes and intrinsic conduction on physiological responses, arrhythmias, symptomatology and quality of life. Lau CP, Tai YT, Leung WH, Wong CK, Lee P, Chung FL. Eur Heart J; 1994 Nov 08; 15(11):1445-55. PubMed ID: 7835358 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. AAIR versus DDDR pacing in the bradycardia tachycardia syndrome: a prospective, randomized, double-blind, crossover trial. Schwaab B, Kindermann M, Schätzer-Klotz D, Berg M, Franow H, Fröhlig G, Schieffer H. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 2001 Nov 08; 24(11):1585-95. PubMed ID: 11816626 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Long-term clinical performance of AAI pacing in patients with sick sinus syndrome: a comparison with dual-chamber pacing. Masumoto H, Ueda Y, Kato R, Usui A, Maseki T, Takagi Y, Usui M. Europace; 2004 Sep 08; 6(5):444-50. PubMed ID: 15294270 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]