These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

194 related items for PubMed ID: 1293307

  • 1.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. Comparison of the effects of amlodipine and captopril on clinic and ambulatory blood pressure.
    Lacourcière Y, Poirier L, Provencher P.
    J Hum Hypertens; 1992 Dec; 6 Suppl 1():S25-8. PubMed ID: 1293305
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. Ambulatory versus clinic blood pressure for the assessment of anti hypertensive efficacy in clinical trials: insights from the Val-Syst Study.
    Palatini P, Dorigatti F, Mugellini A, Spagnuolo V, Varì N, Ferrara R, Bertocchi F.
    Clin Ther; 2004 Sep; 26(9):1436-45. PubMed ID: 15531006
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. Differential time effect profiles of amlodipine, as compared to valsartan, revealed by ambulatory blood pressure monitoring, self blood pressure measurements and dose omission protocol.
    Radauceanu A, Boivin JM, Bernaud C, Fay R, Zannad F, CIC General Practitioners Investigators' Group.
    Fundam Clin Pharmacol; 2004 Aug; 18(4):483-91. PubMed ID: 15312156
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. Hemodynamic and 24-h blood pressure profile of amlodipine monotherapy.
    Ibrahim MM, el-Boghdadly B, Zaghloul SS.
    J Hum Hypertens; 1996 Jul; 10(7):489-94. PubMed ID: 8880565
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. Treatment of mild-to-moderate hypertension with calcium channel blockers: a multicentre comparison of once-daily nifedipine GITS with once-daily amlodipine.
    Kes S, Caglar N, Canberk A, Deger N, Demirtas M, Dortlemez H, Kiliccioglu B, Kozan O, Ovunc K, Turkoglu C.
    Curr Med Res Opin; 2003 Jul; 19(3):226-37. PubMed ID: 12803737
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. Different effects of nifedipine and amlodipine on circulating catecholamine levels in essential hypertensive patients.
    de Champlain J, Karas M, Nguyen P, Cartier P, Wistaff R, Toal CB, Nadeau R, Larochelle P.
    J Hypertens; 1998 Nov; 16(11):1357-69. PubMed ID: 9856375
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. Office and ambulatory blood pressure: a comparison between amlodipine and felodipine ER. Danish Multicentre Group.
    Høegholm A, Wiinberg N, Rasmussen E, Nielsen PE.
    J Hum Hypertens; 1995 Aug; 9(8):611-6. PubMed ID: 8523374
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. Comparative effects of felodipine ER, amlodipine and nifedipine GITS on 24 h blood pressure control and trough to peak ratios in mild to moderate ambulatory hypertension: a forced titration study.
    Lefebvre J, Poirier L, Archambault F, Jewell D, Reed CV, Lacourcière Y.
    Can J Cardiol; 1998 May; 14(5):682-8. PubMed ID: 9627524
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. Comparison of benazepril-amlodipine and captopril-thiazide combinations in the management of mild-to-moderate hypertension.
    Malacco E, Piazza S, Carretta R, Di Somma S, Mugellini A, Bertocchi F, Palatini P, Italian Blood Pressure Study Group.
    Int J Clin Pharmacol Ther; 2002 Jun; 40(6):263-9. PubMed ID: 12078940
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. Persistence of the antihypertensive efficacy of amlodipine and nifedipine GITS after two 'missed doses': a randomised, double-blind comparative trial in Asian patients.
    Ongtengco I, Morales D, Sanderson J, Lu ZR, Beilin LJ, Burke V, Puddey IB, Tanomsup S, Dayi H, Rahardjo P, Zambahari DR, Chen CY, Soenarta AA, Buranakitjaroen P, Tan C, Soon TK, Wu DJ.
    J Hum Hypertens; 2002 Nov; 16(11):805-13. PubMed ID: 12444542
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. Clinic blood pressure responses to two amlodipine salt formulations, adipate and besylate, in adult Korean patients with mild to moderate hypertension: a multicenter, randomized, double-blind, parallel-group, 8-week comparison.
    Lee HY, Kang HJ, Koo BK, Oh BH, Heung-Sun K, Kim KS, Seo HS, Ro YM, Kang JH, Woong CJ, Joo SJ, Kim MH, Joon-Han S, Yoon J, Park SH, Jin-Ok J, Ju AK, Chong-Yun R, Yeon KJ, Park KM, Lim DK, Park SY, Amostar Study Investigators.
    Clin Ther; 2005 Jun; 27(6):728-39. PubMed ID: 16117979
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. Effects of force-titrated valsartan/hydrochlorothiazide versus amlodipine/hydrochlorothiazide on ambulatory blood pressure in patients with stage 2 hypertension: the EVALUATE study.
    Lacourcière Y, Wright JT, Samuel R, Zappe D, Purkayastha D, Black HR, EVALUATE study.
    Blood Press Monit; 2009 Jun; 14(3):112-20. PubMed ID: 19384192
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. Two multicenter, 8-week, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel-group studies evaluating the efficacy and tolerability of amlodipine and valsartan in combination and as monotherapy in adult patients with mild to moderate essential hypertension.
    Philipp T, Smith TR, Glazer R, Wernsing M, Yen J, Jin J, Schneider H, Pospiech R.
    Clin Ther; 2007 Apr; 29(4):563-80. PubMed ID: 17617280
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 10.