These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

97 related items for PubMed ID: 12933593

  • 1. Prospective studies of diagnostic test accuracy when disease prevalence is low.
    Obuchowski NA, Zhou XH.
    Biostatistics; 2002 Dec; 3(4):477-92. PubMed ID: 12933593
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. Avoiding verification bias in screening test evaluation in resource poor settings: a case study from Zimbabwe.
    Gaffikin L, McGrath J, Arbyn M, Blumenthal PD.
    Clin Trials; 2008 Dec; 5(5):496-503. PubMed ID: 18827042
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. Diagnostic test accuracy and prevalence inferences based on joint and sequential testing with finite population sampling.
    Su CL, Gardner IA, Johnson WO.
    Stat Med; 2004 Jul 30; 23(14):2237-55. PubMed ID: 15236428
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. Optimal designs of two-stage studies for estimation of sensitivity, specificity and positive predictive value.
    McNamee R.
    Stat Med; 2002 Dec 15; 21(23):3609-25. PubMed ID: 12436459
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. Incorporating the sampling variation of the disease prevalence when calculating the sample size in a study to determine the diagnostic accuracy of a test.
    Yi Q, Panzarella T, Corey P.
    Control Clin Trials; 2004 Aug 15; 25(4):417-27. PubMed ID: 15296816
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. Small sample estimation of relative accuracy for binary screening tests.
    Alonzo TA, Braun TM, Moskowitz CS.
    Stat Med; 2004 Jan 15; 23(1):21-34. PubMed ID: 14695637
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. Poisson sampling: a sampling strategy for concurrently establishing freedom from disease and estimating population characteristics.
    Williams MS, Ebel ED, Wells SJ.
    Prev Vet Med; 2009 May 01; 89(1-2):34-42. PubMed ID: 19217677
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. Diagnostic uncertainty and costs associated with current emergency department evaluation of low risk chest pain.
    Khare RK, Powell ES, Venkatesh AK, Courtney DM.
    Crit Pathw Cardiol; 2008 Sep 01; 7(3):191-6. PubMed ID: 18791408
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 5.