These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

712 related items for PubMed ID: 12946067

  • 1.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. Clinical and microbiological effects of different restorative materials on the periodontal tissues adjacent to subgingival class V restorations.
    Paolantonio M, D'ercole S, Perinetti G, Tripodi D, Catamo G, Serra E, Bruè C, Piccolomini R.
    J Clin Periodontol; 2004 Mar; 31(3):200-7. PubMed ID: 15016024
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. Bacterial composition and red fluorescence of plaque in relation to primary and secondary caries next to composite: an in situ study.
    Thomas RZ, van der Mei HC, van der Veen MH, de Soet JJ, Huysmans MC.
    Oral Microbiol Immunol; 2008 Feb; 23(1):7-13. PubMed ID: 18173792
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. Clinical evaluation of a compomer and an amalgam primary teeth class II restorations: a 2-year comparative study.
    Kavvadia K, Kakaboura A, Vanderas AP, Papagiannoulis L.
    Pediatr Dent; 2004 Feb; 26(3):245-50. PubMed ID: 15185806
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. Restoration longevity and analysis of reasons for the placement and replacement of restorations provided by vocational dental practitioners and their trainers in the United Kingdom.
    Burke FJ, Cheung SW, Mjör IA, Wilson NH.
    Quintessence Int; 1999 Apr; 30(4):234-42. PubMed ID: 10635250
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. Clinical results and new developments of direct posterior restorations.
    Hickel R, Manhart J, García-Godoy F.
    Am J Dent; 2000 Nov; 13(Spec No):41D-54D. PubMed ID: 11763918
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. Treatment of proximal caries lesions by tunnel restorations.
    Wiegand A, Attin T.
    Dent Mater; 2007 Dec; 23(12):1461-7. PubMed ID: 17320944
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. Minimal invasive treatment for defective restorations: five-year results using sealants.
    Martin J, Fernandez E, Estay J, Gordan VV, Mjor IA, Moncada G.
    Oper Dent; 2013 Dec; 38(2):125-33. PubMed ID: 22788726
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. Early failure of Class II resin composite versus Class II amalgam restorations placed by dental students.
    Overton JD, Sullivan DJ.
    J Dent Educ; 2012 Mar; 76(3):338-40. PubMed ID: 22383602
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. Five-year clinical performance of posterior resin composite restorations placed by dental students.
    Opdam NJ, Loomans BA, Roeters FJ, Bronkhorst EM.
    J Dent; 2004 Jul; 32(5):379-83. PubMed ID: 15193786
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. Effect of pulp protection technique on the clinical performance of amalgam restorations: three-year results.
    Baratieri LN, Machado A, Van Noort R, Ritter AV, Baratieri NM.
    Oper Dent; 2002 Jul; 27(4):319-24. PubMed ID: 12120767
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. Reasons for replacement of Class II amalgam restorations in private practice.
    Allander L, Birkhed D, Bratthall D.
    Swed Dent J; 1990 Jul; 14(4):179-84. PubMed ID: 2255996
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 36.