These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
Pubmed for Handhelds
PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS
Journal Abstract Search
424 related items for PubMed ID: 12947355
1. Active-control clinical trials to establish equivalence or noninferiority: methodological and statistical concepts linked to quality. Gomberg-Maitland M, Frison L, Halperin JL. Am Heart J; 2003 Sep; 146(3):398-403. PubMed ID: 12947355 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Methodology of superiority vs. equivalence trials and non-inferiority trials. Christensen E. J Hepatol; 2007 May; 46(5):947-54. PubMed ID: 17412447 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Equivalence trials: methodologic analysis. Carneiro A. Rev Port Cardiol; 2003 Sep; 22(9):1125-39. PubMed ID: 14655314 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. [Methodological and statistical aspects of equivalence and non inferiority trials]. Elie C, De Rycke Y, Jais JP, Marion-Gallois R, Landais P. Rev Epidemiol Sante Publique; 2008 Aug; 56(4):267-77. PubMed ID: 18703296 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Placebo or active control trials of antipsychotic drugs? Fleischhacker WW, Czobor P, Hummer M, Kemmler G, Kohnen R, Volavka J. Arch Gen Psychiatry; 2003 May; 60(5):458-64. PubMed ID: 12742866 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Sequential designs for equivalence studies. Whitehead J. Stat Med; 1996 Dec 30; 15(24):2703-15. PubMed ID: 8981681 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Active-controlled, non-inferiority trials in oncology: arbitrary limits, infeasible sample sizes and uninformative data analysis. is there another way? Carroll KJ. Pharm Stat; 2006 Dec 30; 5(4):283-93. PubMed ID: 17128427 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Randomized clinical trial design for assessing noninferiority when superiority is expected. Freidlin B, Korn EL, George SL, Gray R. J Clin Oncol; 2007 Nov 01; 25(31):5019-23. PubMed ID: 17971602 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. The importance of preservation of the ethical principle of equipoise in the design of clinical trials: relative impact of the methodological quality domains on the treatment effect in randomized controlled trials. Djulbegovic B, Cantor A, Clarke M. Account Res; 2003 Nov 01; 10(4):301-15. PubMed ID: 14989285 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. [Methods in equivalence and non-inferiority trials]. Christensen E. Ugeskr Laeger; 2008 Sep 15; 170(38):2977-9. PubMed ID: 18808753 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Similar, the same or just not different: a guide for deciding whether treatments are clinically equivalent. [Dept. of Medicine, Division of Cardiology, Univ. of Western Ontario, London, Ontario]. Massel D. Can J Cardiol; 1999 May 15; 15(5):556-62. PubMed ID: 10350665 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Evidence-based medicine, systematic reviews, and guidelines in interventional pain management: part 6. Systematic reviews and meta-analyses of observational studies. Manchikanti L, Datta S, Smith HS, Hirsch JA. Pain Physician; 2009 May 15; 12(5):819-50. PubMed ID: 19787009 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Choice of delta noninferiority margin and dependency of the noninferiority trials. Tsong Y, Zhang J, Levenson M. J Biopharm Stat; 2007 May 15; 17(2):279-88. PubMed ID: 17365224 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Decision-theoretic views on simultaneous testing of superiority and noninferiority. Koyama T, Westfall PH. J Biopharm Stat; 2005 May 15; 15(6):943-55. PubMed ID: 16279353 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Quality of reporting of noninferiority and equivalence randomized trials. Le Henanff A, Giraudeau B, Baron G, Ravaud P. JAMA; 2006 Mar 08; 295(10):1147-51. PubMed ID: 16522835 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]