These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

220 related items for PubMed ID: 12951556

  • 1.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. Imaging characteristics of an amorphous silicon flat-panel detector for digital chest radiography.
    Floyd CE, Warp RJ, Dobbins JT, Chotas HG, Baydush AH, Vargas-Voracek R, Ravin CE.
    Radiology; 2001 Mar; 218(3):683-8. PubMed ID: 11230640
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. DQE analysis on a dual detector phase x-ray imaging system.
    Zhang D, Liu H, Wu X.
    Phys Med Biol; 2008 Sep 21; 53(18):5165-76. PubMed ID: 18723931
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. [Hologic's Flat-Panel Detector].
    Ogata Y, Matsumoto M, Suekane K.
    Igaku Butsuri; 2002 Sep 21; 22(4):264-75. PubMed ID: 12766272
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. Detective quantum efficiency measured as a function of energy for two full-field digital mammography systems.
    Marshall NW.
    Phys Med Biol; 2009 May 07; 54(9):2845-61. PubMed ID: 19384004
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. Measurement of the detective quantum efficiency (DQE) of digital X-ray detectors according to the novel standard IEC 62220-1.
    Illers H, Buhr E, Hoeschen C.
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2005 May 07; 114(1-3):39-44. PubMed ID: 15933079
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. [Physical imaging properties of a flat panel X-ray detector system].
    Yoshida A, Nakamura S, Nishihara S, Kohama C, Takahata A, Fujikawa K.
    Igaku Butsuri; 2002 May 07; 22(4):246-54. PubMed ID: 12766270
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. Quality control measurements for digital x-ray detectors.
    Marshall NW, Mackenzie A, Honey ID.
    Phys Med Biol; 2011 Feb 21; 56(4):979-99. PubMed ID: 21248386
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. Image quality in two phosphor-based flat panel digital radiographic detectors.
    Samei E.
    Med Phys; 2003 Jul 21; 30(7):1747-57. PubMed ID: 12906192
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. An experimental comparison of detector performance for direct and indirect digital radiography systems.
    Samei E, Flynn MJ.
    Med Phys; 2003 Apr 21; 30(4):608-22. PubMed ID: 12722813
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. Performance of a 41 x 41 cm2 amorphous silicon flat panel x-ray detector designed for angiographic and R&F imaging applications.
    Granfors PR, Aufrichtig R, Possin GE, Giambattista BW, Huang ZS, Liu J, Ma B.
    Med Phys; 2003 Oct 21; 30(10):2715-26. PubMed ID: 14596310
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 11.