These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

243 related items for PubMed ID: 12956144

  • 21. Life and death decisions: a reply to Judge Peccarelli.
    Kramer IR.
    John Marshall Law Rev; 1990; 23(4):569-83. PubMed ID: 16622960
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 22. Medical futility or the denial of death?
    Bresnahan JF.
    Camb Q Healthc Ethics; 1993; 2(2):213-7. PubMed ID: 11643205
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 23. Whose life is it, anyway? Where family tragedy meets the separation of powers.
    Economist; 2003 Nov 01; 369(8348):27-8. PubMed ID: 15058299
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 24. An intimate passing: restoring the role of family and religion in dying.
    Boozang KM.
    Univ Pittsbg Law Rev; 1997 Nov 01; 58(3):549-617. PubMed ID: 16086506
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 25. Reflections on the Golubchuk case.
    Gesundheit B.
    Am J Bioeth; 2010 Mar 01; 10(3):73-4. PubMed ID: 20229432
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 26. A moral dilemma: the role of judicial intervention in withholding or withdrawing nutrition and hydration.
    Peccarelli AM.
    John Marshall Law Rev; 1990 Mar 01; 23(4):537-68. PubMed ID: 16622961
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 27.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 28. The Wendland case: on families and fantasies.
    Nelson LJ.
    Med Ethics (Burlingt Mass); 2003 Mar 01; 10(2):8, 12. PubMed ID: 16175728
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 29. Catholicism, death and modern medicine.
    Cahill LS.
    America (NY); 2005 Apr 25; 192(15):14-7. PubMed ID: 16739271
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 30. Chicago opinion of marginal value.
    Parnisari EP.
    Health Prog; 1988 Mar 25; 69(2):8, 10. PubMed ID: 11645605
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 31. Ethical guidelines for treatment of the dying elderly.
    Schostak Z.
    J Halacha Contemporary Society; 1991 Mar 25; No. 22():62-86. PubMed ID: 11659390
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 32. Baby doe redux? The Department of Health and Human Services and the Born-Alive Infants Protection Act of 2002: a cautionary note on normative neonatal practice.
    Sayeed SA.
    Pediatrics; 2005 Oct 25; 116(4):e576-85. PubMed ID: 16199687
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 33. Nancy Cruzan and the best interest standard.
    Veatch RM.
    Midwest Med Ethics; 1990 Oct 25; 6(4):17-9. PubMed ID: 16038072
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 34.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 35. Legal issues in end-of-life care in Oklahoma.
    Cross LL.
    Oklahoma City Univ Law Rev; 2002 Oct 25; 27(3):921-37. PubMed ID: 15478256
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 36.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 37. [Limiting life sustaining therapies].
    Azoulay E.
    Rev Mal Respir; 2006 Sep 25; 23(4 Suppl):13S29-45. PubMed ID: 17057630
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 38. The Virginia Natural Death Act--a critical analysis.
    Murphy JG.
    Univ Richmond Law Rev; 1983 Sep 25; 17(4):863-79. PubMed ID: 11649800
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 39. The patient in the middle--when perspectives differ.
    Hayes C, Killen AR.
    Med Ethics (Burlingt Mass); 2001 Sep 25; ():3, 8. PubMed ID: 15584169
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 40. Autonomy, consent, and the conflict of rights in health care.
    Procaccino JA.
    Air Force Law Rev; 1990 Sep 25; 33():183-91. PubMed ID: 15991412
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Previous] [Next] [New Search]
    of 13.