These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

257 related items for PubMed ID: 12956489

  • 1.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. The ability of different materials to reproduce accurate records of interocclusal relationships in the vertical dimension.
    Ghazal M, Albashaireh ZS, Kern M.
    J Oral Rehabil; 2008 Nov; 35(11):816-20. PubMed ID: 18482345
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. Compressive strength of interocclusal recording materials.
    Keyf F, Altunsoy S.
    Braz Dent J; 2001 Nov; 12(1):43-6. PubMed ID: 11210251
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. Evaluation of vertical accuracy of interocclusal recording materials.
    Ghazal M, Ludwig K, Habil RN, Kern M.
    Quintessence Int; 2008 Oct; 39(9):727-32. PubMed ID: 19093044
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. Reproducibility of interocclusal recording for mandibular removable partial denture in bilateral distal extension cases.
    Togano H, Hideshima M, Ohyama T.
    J Med Dent Sci; 2003 Mar; 50(1):53-61. PubMed ID: 12715920
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. Comparison of 5 types of interocclusal recording materials on the accuracy of articulation of digital models.
    Sweeney S, Smith DK, Messersmith M.
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2015 Aug; 148(2):245-52. PubMed ID: 26232833
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. A laboratory investigation of the accuracy of two impression techniques for single-tooth implants.
    Daoudi MF, Setchell DJ, Searson LJ.
    Int J Prosthodont; 2001 Aug; 14(2):152-8. PubMed ID: 11843452
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. Evaluation of accuracy of multiple dental implant impressions using various splinting materials.
    Hariharan R, Shankar C, Rajan M, Baig MR, Azhagarasan NS.
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2010 Aug; 25(1):38-44. PubMed ID: 20209185
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. Evaluation of the accuracy of interocclusal records in relation to two recording techniques.
    Tripodakis AP, Vergos VK, Tsoutsos AG.
    J Prosthet Dent; 1997 Feb; 77(2):141-6. PubMed ID: 9051601
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. Mounting partially edentulous casts.
    McGill ST, Holmes JR.
    Oper Dent; 2010 Feb; 35(5):592-5. PubMed ID: 20945752
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. Comparing maximum intercuspal contacts of virtual dental patients and mounted dental casts.
    Delong R, Ko CC, Anderson GC, Hodges JS, Douglas WH.
    J Prosthet Dent; 2002 Dec; 88(6):622-30. PubMed ID: 12488856
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. Long-term dimensional stability and reproduction of surface detail of four polyvinyl siloxane duplicating materials.
    Pant R, Juszczyk AS, Clark RK, Radford DR.
    J Dent; 2008 Jun; 36(6):456-61. PubMed ID: 18433976
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. Interocclusal record fabricated with bis-acrylic composite resin and vinyl polysiloxane registration material.
    Vivas JL, Sierraalta M.
    J Prosthet Dent; 2009 Sep; 102(3):199-200. PubMed ID: 19703631
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 13.