These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

101 related items for PubMed ID: 1305287

  • 1. Glass-ionomer-silver-cermet interim Class I restorations for permanent teeth.
    Croll TP, Killian CM.
    Quintessence Int; 1992 Nov; 23(11):731-3. PubMed ID: 1305287
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. Lateral-access Class II restoration using resin-modified glass-ionomer or silver-cermet cement.
    Croll TP.
    Quintessence Int; 1995 Feb; 26(2):121-6. PubMed ID: 7568722
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. [Class II Tunnel restorations of glass-ionomer-silver-Cermet cement and composite].
    Croll TP.
    Quintessenz; 1989 Sep; 40(9):1577-88. PubMed ID: 2517954
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. Fracture resistance of teeth with Class 2 silver amalgam, posterior composite, and glass cermet restorations.
    Jagadish S, Yogesh BG.
    Oper Dent; 1990 Sep; 15(2):42-7. PubMed ID: 2374743
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. Occlusal glass ionomer cermet, resin sandwich and amalgam restorations: a 2-year clinical study.
    Lidums A, Wilkie R, Smales R.
    Am J Dent; 1993 Aug; 6(4):185-8. PubMed ID: 7803005
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. Glass ionomer-silver cermet bonded composite resin Class II tunnel restorations.
    Croll TP.
    Quintessence Int; 1988 Aug; 19(8):533-9. PubMed ID: 2978627
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. Influence of different transitional restorations on the fracture resistance of premolar teeth.
    Qualtrough AJ, Cawte SG, Wilson NH.
    Oper Dent; 2001 Aug; 26(3):267-72. PubMed ID: 11357569
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. [Reinforced glass ionomer restorations in modified Class II cavities].
    Valenzuela V, Stanke F.
    Odontol Chil; 1989 Apr; 37(1):209-13. PubMed ID: 2518367
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. Alternatives to silver amalgam and resin composite in pediatric dentistry.
    Croll TP.
    Quintessence Int; 1998 Nov; 29(11):697-703. PubMed ID: 10200719
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. A comparison of glass cermet cement and amalgam restorations in primary molars.
    Hickel R, Voss A.
    ASDC J Dent Child; 1990 Nov; 57(3):184-8. PubMed ID: 2111833
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. Amalgam, composite resin and glass ionomer cement in Class II restorations in primary molars--a three year clinical evaluation.
    Ostlund J, Möller K, Koch G.
    Swed Dent J; 1992 Nov; 16(3):81-6. PubMed ID: 1496459
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. Class II Vitremer restoration of primary molars.
    Croll TP, Helpin ML.
    ASDC J Dent Child; 1995 Nov; 62(1):17-21. PubMed ID: 7775678
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 6.