These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

335 related items for PubMed ID: 1314793

  • 1. High- and low-challenge exposure doses used to compare intranasal and intramuscular administration of pseudorabies virus vaccine in passively immune pigs.
    Arellano PE, Morrison RB, Molitor TW, Thawley DG.
    J Am Vet Med Assoc; 1992 Mar 01; 200(5):685-91. PubMed ID: 1314793
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. Intranasal vaccination of pigs against Aujeszky's disease: comparison with inactivated vaccines in pigs with low maternal antibody titres.
    De Leeuw PW, Van Oirschot JT.
    Res Vet Sci; 1985 Jul 01; 39(1):34-8. PubMed ID: 2994188
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. Efficacy of a pseudorabies virus vaccine based on deletion mutant strain 783 that does not express thymidine kinase and glycoprotein I.
    van Oirschot JT, Moormann RJ, Berns AJ, Gielkens AL.
    Am J Vet Res; 1991 Jul 01; 52(7):1056-60. PubMed ID: 1654033
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. Vaccination against pseudorabies with glycoprotein gI+ or glycoprotein gI- vaccine.
    Vandeputte J, Chappuis G, Fargeaud D, Précausta P, Guillemin F, Brun A, Desmettre P, Stellmann C.
    Am J Vet Res; 1990 Jul 01; 51(7):1100-6. PubMed ID: 2167620
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. Antibody response of pigs to inactivated monovalent and bivalent vaccines for porcine parvovirus and pseudorabies virus.
    Mengeling WL, Gutekunst DE, Pirtle EC.
    Am J Vet Res; 1980 Oct 01; 41(10):1569-71. PubMed ID: 6261613
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. Immune response of pigs inoculated with virulent pseudorabies virus and pigs inoculated with attenuated or inactivated pseudorabies virus vaccine before and after challenge exposure.
    Kelling CL, Staudinger WL, Rhodes MB.
    Am J Vet Res; 1982 Dec 01; 43(12):2114-20. PubMed ID: 6299139
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. Development of active immunity in newborn pigs with colostral antibodies by vaccination with gIII-deleted PRV.
    Kit S, Kit M, McConnell S, Lawhorn B.
    Acta Vet Hung; 1994 Dec 01; 42(2-3):319-30. PubMed ID: 7810426
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. Vaccine genotype and route of administration affect pseudorabies field virus latency load after challenge.
    Vilnis A, Sussman MD, Thacker BJ, Senn M, Maes RK.
    Vet Microbiol; 1998 May 01; 62(2):81-96. PubMed ID: 9695282
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. Oronasal challenge of fattening pigs after vaccination with an inactivated Aujeszky's disease vaccine.
    Pensaert MB, Vandeputte J, Andries K.
    Res Vet Sci; 1982 Jan 01; 32(1):12-6. PubMed ID: 6283610
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. Latent infection and subsequent reactivation of pseudorabies virus in swine exposed to pseudorabies virus while nursing immune dams.
    Mengeling WL.
    Am J Vet Res; 1989 Oct 01; 50(10):1658-66. PubMed ID: 2552871
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 17.