These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

231 related items for PubMed ID: 1319749

  • 1.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. Sensitive glycoprotein gIII blocking ELISA to distinguish between pseudorabies (Aujeszky's disease)-infected and vaccinated pigs.
    Kit M, Kit S.
    Vet Microbiol; 1991 Jul; 28(2):141-55. PubMed ID: 1651582
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. The detection of antibodies to the glycoprotein X antigen of pseudorabies virus.
    Cook D, Hill H, Snyder M, McMahon P, Kinker D.
    J Vet Diagn Invest; 1990 Jan; 2(1):24-8. PubMed ID: 1965297
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. Antibody response of pseudorabies virus subunit-vaccinated pigs to viral nucleocapsid proteins following low-dose virus challenge of immunity.
    McGinley MJ, Platt KB.
    Am J Vet Res; 1989 Aug; 50(8):1290-3. PubMed ID: 2551199
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. Evaluation of a recombinant vaccinia virus containing pseudorabies (PR) virus glycoprotein genes gp50, gII, and gIII as a PR vaccine for pigs.
    Mengeling WL, Brockmeier SL, Lager KM.
    Arch Virol; 1994 Aug; 134(3-4):259-69. PubMed ID: 8129615
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. Evaluation of serological tests for the detection of pseudorabies gE antibodies during early infection.
    Kinker DR, Swenson SL, Wu LL, Zimmerman JJ.
    Vet Microbiol; 1997 Apr; 55(1-4):99-106. PubMed ID: 9220601
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. Identification of pseudorabies virus-exposed swine with a gI glycoprotein enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay.
    Mellencamp MW, Pfeiffer NE, Suiter BT, Harness JR, Beckenhauer WH.
    J Clin Microbiol; 1989 Oct; 27(10):2208-13. PubMed ID: 2555390
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. Comparison of the abilities of serologic tests to detect pseudorabies-infected pigs during the latent phase of infection.
    White AK, Ciacci-Zanella J, Galeota J, Ele S, Osorio FA.
    Am J Vet Res; 1996 May; 57(5):608-11. PubMed ID: 8723868
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. A study comparing the immunologic responses of swine to pseudorabies viral antigens based on the ELISA, serum virus neutralization, and latex agglutination tests.
    Schoenbaum MA, Beran GW, Murphy DP.
    J Vet Diagn Invest; 1990 Jan; 2(1):29-34. PubMed ID: 1965298
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. Characterization of pseudorabies virus antibody responses in young swine after infection and vaccination by using an immunoglobulin M antibody capture enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay.
    McCaw MB, Molitor TW, Joo HS.
    J Clin Microbiol; 1992 Feb; 30(2):346-50. PubMed ID: 1311334
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 12.