These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

216 related items for PubMed ID: 1322433

  • 1.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. Evaluation of Nycodenz and Percoll density gradients for the selection of motile human spermatozoa.
    Gellert-Mortimer ST, Clarke GN, Baker HW, Hyne RV, Johnston WI.
    Fertil Steril; 1988 Feb; 49(2):335-41. PubMed ID: 2828123
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. Separation of cryopreserved human semen using Sephadex columns, washing, or Percoll gradients.
    Drobnis EZ, Zhong CQ, Overstreet JW.
    J Androl; 1991 Feb; 12(3):201-8. PubMed ID: 1655686
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. Comparison of three sperm preparation media.
    Sharma RK, Seifarth K, Garlak D, Agarwal A.
    Int J Fertil Womens Med; 1999 Feb; 44(3):163-7. PubMed ID: 10435917
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. Selection of human spermatozoa by a hyperosmotic two-layer Percoll gradient.
    Chan YM, Abuzeid MI, Malcomnson JH, Sasy MA.
    Fertil Steril; 1994 Jun; 61(6):1097-102. PubMed ID: 8194624
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. Differential sperm performance as judged by the zona-free hamster egg penetration test relative to differing sperm penetration techniques.
    Chan SY, Tucker MJ.
    Hum Reprod; 1992 Feb; 7(2):255-60. PubMed ID: 1315791
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. Comparison of various methods of processing human cryopreserved-thawed semen samples.
    Srisombut C, Morshedi M, Lin MH, Nassar A, Oehninger S.
    Hum Reprod; 1998 Aug; 13(8):2151-7. PubMed ID: 9756287
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. Cryopreservation effects on a viable sperm sterlet (Acipenser ruthenus) subpopulation obtained by a Percoll density gradient method.
    Horokhovatskyi Y, Dietrich MA, Lebeda I, Fedorov P, Rodina M, Dzyuba B.
    PLoS One; 2018 Aug; 13(8):e0202514. PubMed ID: 30114243
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. Comparison of Percoll, mini-Percoll and swim-up methods for sperm preparation from abnormal semen samples.
    Ng FL, Liu DY, Baker HW.
    Hum Reprod; 1992 Feb; 7(2):261-6. PubMed ID: 1315792
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. Comparison of sperm preparation methods. Wash and concentration, swim-up, migration-gravity sedimentation, 80% Percoll and semen filtration column.
    Matsuoka I, Fujino Y, Ito F, Koh B, Kojima T, Ogita S.
    J Reprod Med; 1995 May; 40(5):342-6. PubMed ID: 7608872
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 11.