These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search


115 related items for PubMed ID: 13340653

  • 21. Miniature skin-mounted preamplifier for measurement of surface electromyographic potentials.
    Johnson SW, Lynn PA, Miller JS, Reed GA.
    Med Biol Eng Comput; 1977 Nov; 15(6):710-1. PubMed ID: 203800
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 22. A new simple method of quantifying the electromyogram to evaluate total muscular activity.
    Harding RH, Sen RN.
    J Physiol; 1969 Oct; 204(2):66P-68P. PubMed ID: 5824655
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 23. Development of an EMG recording device from stimulation electrodes for functional electrical stimulation.
    Muraoka Y.
    Front Med Biol Eng; 2002 Oct; 11(4):323-33. PubMed ID: 12735431
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 24. [Electronic amplifier; first results in clinical radiology].
    MALLARET P.
    Maroc Med; 1955 Jan; 34(356):63-5. PubMed ID: 13243895
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 25.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 26.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 27.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 28. [Electronic image amplifier in routine diagnostic service].
    MUHLEISEN H.
    Fortschr Geb Rontgenstr Nuklearmed; 1956 Jul; 85(1):11-5. PubMed ID: 13356916
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 29.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 30. Passive neutralization of myoelectric interference from neural recording tripoles.
    Pachnis I, Demosthenous A, Donaldson N.
    IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2007 Jun; 54(6 Pt 1):1067-74. PubMed ID: 17554825
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 31.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 32. Analysis and Simple Circuit Design of Double Differential EMG Active Electrode.
    Guerrero FN, Spinelli EM, Haberman MA.
    IEEE Trans Biomed Circuits Syst; 2016 Jun; 10(3):787-95. PubMed ID: 26841414
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 33.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 34. [Creation of the technical means for electromyographic research in polyclinics].
    Bulgakov SP, Gekht BM, Gundarov VP, Razumov IuA.
    Med Tekh; 1983 Jun; (4):34-7. PubMed ID: 6621293
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 35.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 36.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 37. Active surface EMG probe and contour follower.
    Accornero N.
    Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol; 1981 Mar; 51(3):331-2. PubMed ID: 6163620
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 38. Evaluation of total muscular activity by quantification of electromyograms through a summing amplifier.
    Harding RH, Sen RN.
    Med Biol Eng; 1970 Jul; 8(4):343-56. PubMed ID: 5496682
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 39. Comparison of electromyographic signals from monopolar current and potential amplifiers derived from a penniform muscle, the gastrocnemius medialis.
    von Tscharner V, Maurer C, Ruf F, Nigg BM.
    J Electromyogr Kinesiol; 2013 Oct; 23(5):1044-51. PubMed ID: 23938250
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 40.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]


    Page: [Previous] [Next] [New Search]
    of 6.